2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expiration dates and order quantities for perishables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to an inventory control problem of aircraft spare parts during the end-of-life (EOL) phase of fleet operations, Hur, Keskin and Schmidt (2018) presented an algorithm that computes the optimal final order size of components under a budget constraint [21]. Ketzenberg, Gaukler and Salin (2018) addressed the problem of how to set expiration dates for perishable products to balance hazard costs and perishing costs in the context of a retailer that sells a random lifespan product under periodic review [22]. In order to select a final design representing the best trade-off between safety and economy, in a life-cycle perspective, Venanzi et al (2019) proposed an automated procedure for the estimation of lifecycle repair costs of different bridge design solutions [23].…”
Section: Total Cost Assessment With the Consideration Of Lifespanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to an inventory control problem of aircraft spare parts during the end-of-life (EOL) phase of fleet operations, Hur, Keskin and Schmidt (2018) presented an algorithm that computes the optimal final order size of components under a budget constraint [21]. Ketzenberg, Gaukler and Salin (2018) addressed the problem of how to set expiration dates for perishable products to balance hazard costs and perishing costs in the context of a retailer that sells a random lifespan product under periodic review [22]. In order to select a final design representing the best trade-off between safety and economy, in a life-cycle perspective, Venanzi et al (2019) proposed an automated procedure for the estimation of lifecycle repair costs of different bridge design solutions [23].…”
Section: Total Cost Assessment With the Consideration Of Lifespanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adenso-Diaz et al (2017) and Buisman et al (2017) also present studies on using dynamically-set shelf life and offering dynamic pricing based on remaining life [35,36]. Most recently, Ketzenberg et al (2018) derive inventory control and expiration dating policies where a hazard cost of selling perished units is considered, and provide insights on the link between perishability and inventory cost [37].…”
Section: Value Of Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, both service and customer loyalty would be improved by optimizing the cross-docking process. In the context of this strategy, supply time and its adaptation to demand would be a critical point to consider as we deal with products not apt for long storage periods [ 25 ]. This strategy would also have positive consequences on the reduction of waste both in storage centers at the place of origin and at retail points of sale (by increasing their shelf life).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%