2013
DOI: 10.4081/mrm.2013.542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expiratory CT scan in patients with normal inspiratory CT scan: a finding of obliterative bronchiolitis and other causes of bronchiolar obstruction

Abstract: Expiratory CT scan is usually obtained as supplement to normal inspiratory CT scan to recognize air-trapping, which is expression of small airways obstruction. In some patients the air-trapping may be the only sign of an early-stage small airways disease in an otherwise normal lung. The purpose of this article is to illustrate pathologic conditions, namely obliterative bronchiolitis, in which expiratory CT scan can be abnormal despite normal inspiratory CT examination, and to highlight indications for this tec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also repeated this analysis using PRM‐defined ROIs, which also supports this notion and furthermore indicates that model predictions are sensitive to structural indications of pathological alterations, for example, emphysema and fSAD. We do note however that these structural indications (i.e., gas trapping and emphysema) are less obvious in TLC scans, 53,55 which results in larger differences between DIR and predictions for single‐input TLC model. This is illustrated in Figure 9 where compared to the other models, the single‐input TLC model overestimated volume change in fSAD regions and underestimated volume change in normal regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also repeated this analysis using PRM‐defined ROIs, which also supports this notion and furthermore indicates that model predictions are sensitive to structural indications of pathological alterations, for example, emphysema and fSAD. We do note however that these structural indications (i.e., gas trapping and emphysema) are less obvious in TLC scans, 53,55 which results in larger differences between DIR and predictions for single‐input TLC model. This is illustrated in Figure 9 where compared to the other models, the single‐input TLC model overestimated volume change in fSAD regions and underestimated volume change in normal regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Based on these structure–function relationships, we hypothesized that AI predictions of local tissue expansion using only a single lung CT image will be correlated with registration‐derived Jacobian estimations, albeit to a lesser degree compared with AI predictions using paired images. Secondly, we hypothesize that single‐image AI predictions will be more accurate using FRC images compared to total lung capacity (TLC) images, since FRC reveals pathophysiologic information not apparent at TLC, such as gas trapping 53–55 . While several deep learning‐based registration methods have been proposed which involve predicting the lung motion in three dimensions, 48 predicting the Jacobian image directly only involves estimating the tissue distensibility without having to estimate motion making it a less complex task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for CT, it has been reported that various degrees of air trapping can be observed in subjects with normal pulmonary function, irrespective of current smoking status and cigarette consumption. 34 In particular in asymptomatic healthy subjects with normal pulmonary function, air trapping is usually limited to fewer than three adjacent secondary pulmonary lobules (“lobular air-trapping”). 35 Since it has been shown that the sensitivity of MRI is lower compared to CT, it may be speculated, that such limited, clinically insignificant air trapping will not be seen with MRI, while any air trapping large enough to detect with MRI is probably clinically significant, which would make MRI the less sensitive, but potentially more specific test.…”
Section: Dynamic Airway Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%