2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2984412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explainability of a Machine Learning Granting Scoring Model in Peer-to-Peer Lending

Abstract: Peer-to-peer (P2P) lending demands effective and explainable credit risk models. Typical machine learning algorithms offer high prediction performance, but most of them lack explanatory power. However, this deficiency can be solved with the help of the explainability tools proposed in the last few years, such as the SHAP values. In this work, we assess the well-known logistic regression model and several machine learning algorithms for granting scoring in P2P lending. The comparison reveals that the machine le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of a wide range of techniques (including statistical and soft computing) results in a more holistic analysis: i.e., such a combination of methods allows to generalize the usefulness of individual predictor variables more profoundly. The selection of these methods is based on their good performance for solving classification problems (e.g., [10], [40]). In fact, all these approaches have also been applied before in analyzing problems about exporting, for instance, [9] and [41] for logistic regression, [42] and [43] for rough set theory, [10] and [101] for decision trees (C4.5), [8] and [15] for artificial neural networks.…”
Section: Methods and Their Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of a wide range of techniques (including statistical and soft computing) results in a more holistic analysis: i.e., such a combination of methods allows to generalize the usefulness of individual predictor variables more profoundly. The selection of these methods is based on their good performance for solving classification problems (e.g., [10], [40]). In fact, all these approaches have also been applied before in analyzing problems about exporting, for instance, [9] and [41] for logistic regression, [42] and [43] for rough set theory, [10] and [101] for decision trees (C4.5), [8] and [15] for artificial neural networks.…”
Section: Methods and Their Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulated institutions are not willing to adapt models that cannot explain predictions and this is hampering the use of machine learning, specifically deep learning models. However, Ariza-Garzón et al [24] conducted a study in credit scoring where the focus was to make non-transparent machine learning models explainable. In the study, classical machine learning models were compared to a logistic regression model for Peer-to-Peer (P2P) lending and predictions were explained using SHAP values.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serrano-Cinca et al [14] select 18 factor variables classified into five groups: credit grade, credit assessment of the borrower, credit characteristics, loan applicant characteristics, credit history and indebtedness. Employment length at the current position, previous experience with the P2P lending platform, state of address, and FICO is also used [15].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%