2019
DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/edz042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining Citizen Attitudes to Strategies of Democratic Defense in Europe: A Resource in Responses to Contemporary Challenges to Liberal Democracy?

Abstract: It has long been speculated that banning parties from participation in elections may be counterproductive because it might provoke societal resistance. Using the European Social Survey (2002–2010; N = 195,405), our study suggests otherwise. We demonstrate that party bans enjoy the legitimacy of majority support. This holds true irrespective of countries’ resilience to extremist influences (or lack thereof) resulting from “institutional intolerance,” electoral entry barriers and authoritarian legacies. Individu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is argued, for example, that in some countries democratic institutions and processes have become over decades so self‐evident and self‐explanatory and—because of that—so deeply ingrained in culture and personalities, that current criticizing of “wheels of democracy” has become no more than another reflection of being a dedicated supporter of democracy. If so, that criticism in no way means criticizing democracy as a commonly accepted, fully legitimized, political regime (de Leeuw and Bourne 2020). Studying data from East‐Central Europe, Pop‐Eleches and Tucker (2013) argue that those brought up, educated, and living their lives under state‐socialist institutional regimes criticize current works of democracy in their countries by applying standards inherited from nonexisting institutions of state socialism.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is argued, for example, that in some countries democratic institutions and processes have become over decades so self‐evident and self‐explanatory and—because of that—so deeply ingrained in culture and personalities, that current criticizing of “wheels of democracy” has become no more than another reflection of being a dedicated supporter of democracy. If so, that criticism in no way means criticizing democracy as a commonly accepted, fully legitimized, political regime (de Leeuw and Bourne 2020). Studying data from East‐Central Europe, Pop‐Eleches and Tucker (2013) argue that those brought up, educated, and living their lives under state‐socialist institutional regimes criticize current works of democracy in their countries by applying standards inherited from nonexisting institutions of state socialism.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are also extremely popular, with this "militant" approach to defending democratic systems enjoying support even among citizens who have more negative attitudes toward democracy. 17 The question remains, however, whether party bans are also effective. Examining European democratic experiences since the end of First World War shows that party bans have succeeded in some cases, but failed in others.…”
Section: Four Remedies But Only One Curementioning
confidence: 99%