2014
DOI: 10.1093/sf/sou004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining Pay Disparities between Top Executives and Nonexecutive Employees: A Relative Bargaining Power Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, inequality among middle and high paid workers reflects labor's broader, contextual ability to keep top pay in check. Shin (2014) showed that dense unionization in an industry kept top pay within firms in check,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, inequality among middle and high paid workers reflects labor's broader, contextual ability to keep top pay in check. Shin (2014) showed that dense unionization in an industry kept top pay within firms in check,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Right to Work affects the distribution of resources in ways theoretically anticipated by previous stratification research on the heterogeneity of unions and wage setting (Firpo et al 2009, Western and Rosenfeld 2011, Shin 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obviously, it is unlikely that the changed dividend policies of Japanese firms alone caused such gap. But its impact on income disparities could still be substantial when combined with other measures of shareholder value maximization, such as executive stock options (Shin ). Further research is warranted to explore the distributional implications of increased dividend payouts by Japanese firms and, more broadly, the global diffusion of shareholder value in Japan.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EEPG is measured by logarithm of difference between the average of executive compensation and the average of employees' compensation [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%