Explaining Support for Combatants during Wartime: A Survey Experiment in Afghanistan

Abstract

How are civilian attitudes toward combatants affected by wartime victimization? Are these effects conditional on which combatant inflicted the harm? We investigate the determinants of wartime civilian attitudes towards combatants using a survey experiment across 204 villages in five Pashtun-dominated provinces of Afghanistan -the heart of the Taliban insurgency. We use endorsement experiments to indirectly elicit truthful answers to sensitive questions about support for different combatants. We demonstrate that civilian attitudes are asymmetric in nature. Harm inflicted by the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) is met with reduced support for ISAF and increased support for the Taliban, but Taliban-inflicted harm does not translate into greater ISAF support. We combine a multistage sampling design with hierarchical modeling to estimate ISAF and Taliban support at the individual, village, and district levels, permitting a more fine-grained analysis of wartime attitudes than previously possible.

Rainfall variability and violence in rural Kenya: Investigating the effects of drought and the role of local institutions with survey data

“…A major shift in political violence research in recent years is a focus on gathering large-N structured survey data characterizing those who participate in violence (whether as victims or perpetrators), the motivation being an understanding of the beliefs and attitudes of populations where conflict emanates (e.g. Lyall et al, 2013;Blair et al, 2013;Oyefusi, 2008). There are multiple direct and indirect paths through which violent attitudes can translate into observed violent behavior (see also Linke et al, 2015).…”

Affirmative Action Attitudes of Whites: Evidence from a List Experiment Survey in Brazil

“…In total, 515 questionnaires were completed and 440 students declared themselves as _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 6 An argument can be made that item 04 could be seen as a general criticism of vestibular, but the empirical tests performed and shown in Table 02 demonstrates that almost none of the respondents agree with all list items, indicating that the negative correlation between items was successful and no ceiling effect was found. Analyses were conducted using the list package on statistical analysis software R. The package implements the methods developed by Imai (2011), Blair and Imai (2012), Lyall, Blair and Imai (2013) and Imai, Greene and Park (2015).…”

Lessons Learned from Stabilization Initiatives in Afghanistan: A Systematic Review of Existing Research

“…This is further complicated by the integration of potential insurgents in local communities. Indeed, broader studies on programs with scope beyond stabilization (e.g., development programs, long-term capacity building initiatives) find that humanitarian assistance 20 in conflict settings does not have uniform effects and the impact of violence on changes in civilian attitudes depends on whether the perpetrator is viewed as part of their in-group (Lyall, 2016;Lyall, Blair and Imai, 2013).…”