Explaining the impact of differences in voting patterns on resilience and relational load in romantic relationships during the transition to the Trump presidency

Abstract

The theory of resilience and relational load was used to examine the impact of voting patterns in the 2016 U.S. presidential election on individuals’ romantic relationships. Married/cohabitating individuals ( N = 961) completed online surveys at three time points during the transition to the Trump Presidency. The results supported our emotional capital hypothesis in that ongoing relationship maintenance in one’s relationship predicted less stress about the Trump presidency, less conflict, less relational load, greater communal orientation, and greater relational resilience. The positive effect of ongoing relationship maintenance on these relational outcomes occurred regardless of how the partners voted. At the same time, voting differently than one’s partner was still stressful and negatively influenced these outcomes. The results also supported our relational load model, which found that differences in voting negatively affected individuals’ communal orientation and the degree to which they maintained their relationships, which fueled conflict and stress. This conflict and stress was associated with an increase in relational load and a decrease in relational resilience.

“My Husband Thinks I’m Crazy”: COVID-19-Related Conflict in Couples with Young Children

“…These findings reveal the consequences of political (Barrios & Hochberg, 2020;Gollust et al, 2020;Kushner et al, 2020;Painter & Qiu, 2020) and gender (Haischer et al, 2020;Kramer, 2020) gaps in attitudes about COVID-19. Specifically, and like other pre-pandemic research (Afifi et al, 2020;Bélanger & Eagles, 2007;Huckfeldt et al, 2004;van Duyn, 2018) we find that disagreements about politicized topics like the COVID-19 pandemic can be a serious source of conflict in families.…”

“…Although research has not examined this possibility directly, it does show that couples with different religious views and attendance report more conflict than couples who have similar views and practices (Curtis & Ellison, 2002). Similarly, couples who vote differently report more conflict, less communal orientation, and less relational resilience following the election (Afifi et al, 2020). Some politically liberal women with conservative husbands even feel compelled to hide their political views (van Duyn, 2018).…”

Couples managing chronic illness: A test of the extended theoretical model of communal coping

“…In line with that logic, scholars have examined communal coping in a variety of chronic health contexts and have generally found that communal coping is beneficial. Our goal in this study was to test the logic of the extended TMCC (Afifi et al, 2020) by examining relationships among the dimensions of communal coping, perceived physical health, resilience, and relationship experiences for couples managing chronic illnesses.…”

“…Specifically, relationships are a source of strength that can proffer emotional support and facilitate problem-solving in the face of stress, thus fortifying well-being, including physical functioning. Afifi et al (2020) argue that communal coping is the process through which relationships offer that strength.…”

“Who’s gonna love a junkie? But he does”: Exploring couples’ identity negotiations and dyadic coping in the context of opioid use disorder

“…A couple identity is defined as “seeing the relationship itself as an entity” (Badr et al, 2008, p. 213). Couples with a strong communal orientation tend to approach life’s difficulties as a team and protect their partner and relationship during times of stress (Afifi et al, 2020; Badr et al, 2008). Research suggests that identifying as a couple (as opposed to identifying as two individuals) corresponds with positive health-related outcomes.…”