2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca2a4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining the Moderate UV/X-Ray Correlation in AGN

Abstract: The UV/optical and X-ray variability of active galactic nuclei (AGN) have long been expected to be well correlated as a result of the X-ray illumination of the accretion disk. Recent monitoring campaigns of nearby AGN, however, found that their X-ray and UV/optical emission are only moderately correlated, challenging the aforementioned paradigm. In this work, we aim to demonstrate that due to the definition of the cross-correlation function, a low UV/X-ray correlation is well expected in the case of an X-ray i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, observations of other objects also show that the X-ray to UV correlation is typically weaker than the UV to optical correlation (e.g., Edelson et al 2019;Cackett et al 2020;Hernández Santisteban et al 2020). Dynamic variability in the X-ray source can potentially explain the moderate X-ray to UV correlation (Panagiotou et al 2022). However, in some cases the X-ray and UV are not correlated at all (e.g., Schimoia et al 2015;Buisson et al 2018;Morales et al 2019), presenting a challenge to the simplest reprocessing scenario.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Similarly, observations of other objects also show that the X-ray to UV correlation is typically weaker than the UV to optical correlation (e.g., Edelson et al 2019;Cackett et al 2020;Hernández Santisteban et al 2020). Dynamic variability in the X-ray source can potentially explain the moderate X-ray to UV correlation (Panagiotou et al 2022). However, in some cases the X-ray and UV are not correlated at all (e.g., Schimoia et al 2015;Buisson et al 2018;Morales et al 2019), presenting a challenge to the simplest reprocessing scenario.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…If the corona is extended out to ∼100 R g , the X-ray source will preferentially irradiate larger radii in the disk, making the response functions wider, and thus the UV-optical time lags longer (see Equation (1) of Kammoun et al 2021 for more details). Recently, these authors modeled the X-ray-UVOIR lags of several sources, and Panagiotou et al (2022) modeled both the time lags and power spectra in NGC 5548 with general relativistic ray-tracing simulations (Dovčiak et al 2022), and constrained the height of the corona to be somewhere between ∼7-70 R g for previously studied AGN. 31 An important caveat here is that the optical reverberation lags, from which this mass was derived, were measured with respect to the 5100 Å continuum, assuming it all originates in the accretion disk.…”
Section: On the Very Long X-ray-uvoir Lagsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, AGN disks with scattering atmospheres may help account for the longer-than-anticipated lag timescales of recent AGN reverberation mapping campaigns (Hall et al 2018). However, other models, such as those in Panagiotou et al (2022a), suggest that the canonical reprocessing of X-rays through absorption can also produce longer lag timescales and poorly correlated X-ray and UV light curves, like those observed for NGC 5548. In addition, observations using X-ray spectroscopy suggest that AGN disks may not be fully ionized or scattering dominated (e.g., García et al 2019).…”
Section: Hard X-rays Have Little Impact On Uv Emissionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This correlation agrees with observational results that suggest that X-ray and UV light curves are not as well correlated as we might expect if X-rays are the main driver of UV and optical variability as in traditional reprocessing models (e.g., Schimoia et al 2015;Edelson et al 2019;Cackett et al 2023). However, canonical reprocessing models could produce lower X-ray to UV correlations if the X-ray light curve is nonstationary, for example due to changes in the height or temperature of the corona on timescales shorter than the observing campaign (Panagiotou et al 2022a).…”
Section: Summary and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation