2012
DOI: 10.1086/666610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining Variation in the Effect of Floral Density on Pollinator Visitation

Abstract: Pollinator responses to floral density have important implications for plant biology. In particular, a decline in pollinator visitation at low density can cause an Allee effect (a positive relation of fitness to density) in the plant population, which heightens that population's vulnerability to extinction. Empiricists have reported a variety of relations between flower or plant density and pollinator visitation rates. Here I develop and test a model that provides explanations for this diversity. The model ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is partially consistent with previous studies of the incidence of M. violaceum on the related host species S. latifolia which found that mid‐sized populations were more likely to be diseased than very small or very large populations (Antonovics et al , ). Such a non‐linear pattern is potentially due to a balance between epidemiological processes: smaller populations attract fewer long‐distance pollinators carrying spores from other populations (Essenberg ) and are more prone to loss of disease due to stochastic effects, while transmission in very large (often dense) populations may decline due to low pollinator/host ratios (Antonovics et al ). We did not find a significant decline in the incidence of disease among the largest size class (> 300 individuals), though it is possible that our methods of population sampling in areas where there was continuous host presence artificially minimized the sizes of the largest populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is partially consistent with previous studies of the incidence of M. violaceum on the related host species S. latifolia which found that mid‐sized populations were more likely to be diseased than very small or very large populations (Antonovics et al , ). Such a non‐linear pattern is potentially due to a balance between epidemiological processes: smaller populations attract fewer long‐distance pollinators carrying spores from other populations (Essenberg ) and are more prone to loss of disease due to stochastic effects, while transmission in very large (often dense) populations may decline due to low pollinator/host ratios (Antonovics et al ). We did not find a significant decline in the incidence of disease among the largest size class (> 300 individuals), though it is possible that our methods of population sampling in areas where there was continuous host presence artificially minimized the sizes of the largest populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…abundance, density and spatial distribution of flowers) modulates these preferences [43,44]. Floral traits are known to determine pollinator preferences [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant-pollinator interactions vary with plant population size, density, and habitat context (Essenberg, 2012;Mayer, Van Rossum & Jacquemart 2012). Habitats supporting a high abundance and species richness of flowering plants may either enhance or disrupt the transference of pollen to plants (Blaauw & Isaacs, 2014;Vanbergen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%