2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-62466-8_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explanation Ontology: A Model of Explanations for User-Centered AI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To ensure objectivity when evaluating EduCOR, we decided to use inductive methods following [4,27] to select the most relevant evaluation criteria for our proposed ontology. Therefore, based on [2,12], we focus on coverage and adaptability as key performance indicators (KPIs) of the EduCOR ontology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To ensure objectivity when evaluating EduCOR, we decided to use inductive methods following [4,27] to select the most relevant evaluation criteria for our proposed ontology. Therefore, based on [2,12], we focus on coverage and adaptability as key performance indicators (KPIs) of the EduCOR ontology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this step of the ontology evaluation, we defined specific tasks and evaluated EduCOR's ability to fulfil them. For the task-based evaluation, we followed the approach of Chari et al [4], where competency questions are defined to reflect the main contributions of EduCOR, based on a sample use case that is expected to be executed by a potential user of the ontology. Such a use case is described as a general use case in Sect.…”
Section: Task-based Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In big data-enabled, multidisciplinary geoscience research projects, interpretability of the workflow will be a big advantage for people from different disciplinary background to understand the result and finding (Reichstein et al, 2019). This overlaps with the work on explainable and meaningful Artificial Intelligence in computer science (Hagras, 2018;Holzinger, 2018;Chari et al, 2020). In the geoscience community, there has been some initial work on this topic in workflow platforms, such as the Meaning Spatial Statistics initiative (Stasch et al, 2014), and we anticipate that more works will appear in the near future.…”
Section: Big Data Smart Data Data Science and The Changes They Bring To Geosciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this step of the ontology evaluation, we defined specific tasks and evaluated EduCOR's ability to fulfil them. For the task-based evaluation, we followed the approach of Chari et al [4], where competency questions are defined to reflect the main contributions of EduCOR, based on a sample use case that is expected to be executed by a potential user of the ontology. Such a use case is described as a general use case in Section 3.…”
Section: Task-based Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, recent works revealed the increased interest in educational Knowledge Graphs [10,20], which, however, often lack an underlying ontology or schema [5]. Commercial products seem to follow a similar direction, as they often do not use or do not publish their underlying knowledge schema 4 . Additionally, surveys in e-learning have shown that an ontology is helpful in achieving personalised recommendation systems [17,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%