European Test Symposium (ETS'05)
DOI: 10.1109/ets.2005.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting an Infrastructure IP to Reduce the Costs of Memory Diagnosis Costs in SoCs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An IEEE 1500 wrapper is included in the BIST design to interface the processor with the outside, supporting the commands for running the BIST and accessing to its results. The wrapper is compliant with the suggestions of the 1500 standard and allows the execution of the diagnostic procedures by means of an access protocol common to all the other memory BISTs included in the SoC structure [26].…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An IEEE 1500 wrapper is included in the BIST design to interface the processor with the outside, supporting the commands for running the BIST and accessing to its results. The wrapper is compliant with the suggestions of the 1500 standard and allows the execution of the diagnostic procedures by means of an access protocol common to all the other memory BISTs included in the SoC structure [26].…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that case, the authors of [5] suggested the inclusion of an Infrastructure IP (I-IP) in charge of properly managing the activation of the test algorithms by the different cores, retrieving the corresponding results, and automatically implementing the steps required by the diagnosis process. This solution may provide some benefits, e.g., in terms of flexibility, ATE requirements, and test time, with a reduced cost in terms of extra hardware.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some approaches to detect NPSFs, such as the tiling method (Goor, 1991;Hayes, 1975), the two-group method (Goor, 1991;Hayes, 1980), the row-March algorithm (Franklin and Saluja, 1996), and a multi-background method (Cockburn, 1995;Yarmolik et al, 1998), have been proposed. The new publications deal with reduction in the costs of memory testing (Bernardi et al, 2006;Bernardi et al, 2005), fault detection by output response comparison of identical circuits using half-frequency compatible sequences (Pomeranz and Reddy, 2006), transparent memory testing (Li, 2007). Traditional March algorithms (Goor, 1991) have been widely used in memory testing because of their linear time complexity, high fault coverage, and ease in built-in self-test (BIST) implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%