Exploiting programmable architectures for WiFi/ZigBee inter-technology cooperation

Abstract

The increasing complexity of wireless standards has shown that protocols cannot be designed once for all possible deployments, especially when unpredictable and mutating interference situations are present due to the coexistence of heterogeneous technologies. As such, flexibility and (re)programmability of wireless devices is crucial in the emerging scenarios of technology proliferation and unpredictable interference conditions. In this paper, we focus on the possibility to improve coexistence performance of WiFi and ZigBee networks by exploiting novel programmable architectures of wireless devices able to support run-time modifications of medium access operations. Differently from software-defined radio (SDR) platforms, in which every function is programmed from scratch, our programmable architectures are based on a clear decoupling between elementary commands (hard-coded into the devices) and programmable protocol logic (injected into the devices) according to which the commands execution is scheduled. Our contribution is two-fold: first, we designed and implemented a cross-technology time division multiple access (TDMA) scheme devised to provide a global synchronization signal and allocate alternating channel intervals to WiFi and ZigBee programmable nodes; second, we used the OMF control framework to define an interference detection and adaptation strategy that in principle could work in independent and autonomous networks. Experimental results prove the benefits of the envisioned solution.

Privacy-Preserving Overgrid: Secure Data Collection for the Smart Grid

“…Moreover, the number of real messages transmitted over the network does not change if we build a topology in which, at each node i, only one sub-node is connected to each neighbor node, as shown in Figure 4. Similarly to the topology considered in the Multi-party algorithm presented in [29,30], sub-nodes are sequentially connected in a ring topology inside each real node. This design choice makes the internal steps easy to be implemented and guarantees that the overlay network is not partitioned.…”

Coexistence between IEEE802.15.4 and IEEE802.11 through cross-technology signaling

“…The major advantage of this technology is that it makes use of existing hardware drivers, the drawback that it results in a fixed schedule due to the lack of control over the beacon interval. In a third solution [8] the medium is statically divided between IEEE802.11 and IEEE802.15.4 nodes. Within their own time frame the nodes can use a technology specific MAC protocol (e.g.…”

Overhead caused by WiFi on ZigBee Networks using Slotted CSMA/CA

“…Other researchers such as [17], [18] and [19] focused on new techniques or equipment for eliminating the interference effect but these techniques or equipment are not currently supported by the standards or provided in standard hardware architecture.…”