2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10115-012-0590-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting semantic annotations for open information extraction: an experience in the biomedical domain

Abstract: Abstract.The increasing amount of unstructured text published on the Web is demanding new tools and methods to automatically process and extract relevant information. Traditional information extraction has focused on harvesting domain-specific, pre-specified relations, which usually requires manual labor and heavy machinery. Especially in the biomedical domain the main efforts have been directed towards the recognition of welldefined entities such as genes or proteins, which constitutes the basis for extractin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the error analysis in Section 4.4, approximately two thirds of the false negative concepts were probably attributed to the relation extraction tool we have used. However, there exist many other approaches aimed at extracting semantic relations from the biomedical literature or web documents, and some of them were also used UMLS and/or MetaMap [43]. Therefore, our system may gain further recall by incorporating the output of other relation extraction approaches or tools as secondary knowledge sources in addition to the SemMedDB to our proposed pipeline process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the error analysis in Section 4.4, approximately two thirds of the false negative concepts were probably attributed to the relation extraction tool we have used. However, there exist many other approaches aimed at extracting semantic relations from the biomedical literature or web documents, and some of them were also used UMLS and/or MetaMap [43]. Therefore, our system may gain further recall by incorporating the output of other relation extraction approaches or tools as secondary knowledge sources in addition to the SemMedDB to our proposed pipeline process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Attias et al [28] present an OpenIE system for biomedical named entity recognition based on NELL [27], and propose a method for assessing seed qualities to prevent semantic drift. Nebot et al [30,31] propose a scalable method to extract surfaceform biomedical relationships not specific to any relation type and Input: raw text Amphetamine and cocaine decreased susceptibility to myoclonus in young mice and increased susceptibility in mature mice. <CHEMICAL>Amphetamine</ CHEMICAL> and <CHEMICAL>cocaine</CHEMICAL> decreased susceptibility to <DISEASE>myoclonus</DISEASE> in young <SPECIES>mice</ SPECIES> and increased susceptibility in mature <SPECIES>mice</SPECIES>.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nebot and Berlanga [27] explore the use of semantic annotation in the biomedical domain. They present a scalable method to extract domain-independent relationships.…”
Section: Semantic Annotation Approaches Based On Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%