2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2011
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2011.5934969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting sensing diversity for confident sensing in wireless sensor networks

Abstract: Abstract-Wireless sensor networks for human health monitoring, military surveillance, and disaster warning all have stringent accuracy requirements for detecting or classifying events while maximizing system lifetime. We define meeting such user accuracy requirements as confident sensing. To perform confident sensing and reduce energy, we must address sensing diversity: sensing capability differences among heterogeneous and homogeneous sensors in a specific deployment. We are among the first to explore the imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to obtain stringent accuracy requirements for target detection or classification while extending network lifetime as much as possible in the military vehicles monitoring [31], only a few sensor nodes are activated incessantly while most of sensor nodes are occasionally active. According to the experiment of the reference in [32], an average of 10 active sensor nodes can cover all critical locations in SensIT experiment. Thus we can construct a truncated dataset from the original SensIT dataset [31] including the sensing data of 23 nodes, which exits long-tail phenomena and is utilized to demonstrate effectiveness of the proposed method.…”
Section: A Experimental Methodology and Related Settings 1) Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain stringent accuracy requirements for target detection or classification while extending network lifetime as much as possible in the military vehicles monitoring [31], only a few sensor nodes are activated incessantly while most of sensor nodes are occasionally active. According to the experiment of the reference in [32], an average of 10 active sensor nodes can cover all critical locations in SensIT experiment. Thus we can construct a truncated dataset from the original SensIT dataset [31] including the sensing data of 23 nodes, which exits long-tail phenomena and is utilized to demonstrate effectiveness of the proposed method.…”
Section: A Experimental Methodology and Related Settings 1) Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy savings are achieved by keeping active only one node from each subgroup at a time. The authors of [28] explore the impact of sensing diversity on sensor collaboration with the goal to achieve confident sensing coverage. The study of sensing diversity is based on a sensor network deployment for vehicle detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WolfPack [13] implements an online sensor clustering protocol that pursues high sensing confidence. Works such as [24] express the accuracy of context estimation through a quality of inference (QoINF) function that captures the dependence of estimation accuracy on the selected sensors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%