2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting the centimeter resolution of UAV multispectral imagery to improve remote-sensing estimates of canopy structure and biochemistry in sugar beet crops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
113
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the influence of the dark green pixels from shaded leaves, the mND blue yielded higher R 2 in the forward viewing direction compared to the backward direction. This was similar to the finding reported by Jay et al (2019) on quantifying the biochemistry in sugar beet crops. In contrast, the other two VIs (CI red-edge , CI green) appeared to be much less sensitive to VZA.…”
Section: Difference In Estimation Accuracy Between Vissupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the influence of the dark green pixels from shaded leaves, the mND blue yielded higher R 2 in the forward viewing direction compared to the backward direction. This was similar to the finding reported by Jay et al (2019) on quantifying the biochemistry in sugar beet crops. In contrast, the other two VIs (CI red-edge , CI green) appeared to be much less sensitive to VZA.…”
Section: Difference In Estimation Accuracy Between Vissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The visible atmospherically resistant index (VARI) derived from the visible region has proved to be sensitive to vegetation fraction (Gitelson et al, 2002) and correlate well with LAI and biomass (Gitelson et al, 2003b). The modified normalized difference index with a blue band (mND blue ) was proposed by Jay et al (2019) as a strong indicator of crop chlorophyll content with weak effect of soil background. The green band chlorophyll index (CI green ) and the red edge chlorophyll index (CI red-edge ) have proved to be accurate predictors of leaf (Gitelson et al, 2003a;Schlemmer et al, 2013) and canopy chlorophyll contents (Gitelson 2005;Schlemmer et al, 2013;Clevers et al, 2017).…”
Section: Image Pre-processing and Spectral Vegetation Index Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, high cost, low revisit frequency and potential cloud occurrence limit the suitability of satellite remote sensing in agriculture, while operational complexity presents a major constraint for manned airborne platforms [121][122][123]. Indeed, high spatial resolution images collected at low altitude have favorable signal-to-noise ratio, and it is possible to eliminate soil and shadow pixels with high confidence [40,[124][125][126]. Additionally, image information (radiance and reflectance) extracted from pure vegetation pixels is likely to reduce the effects of shadows and background soils.…”
Section: Model Scalability and Transferabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of the green and infrared bands for the estimation of LCC has previously been demonstrated [9,27]. Specifically, the Green Chlorophyll Vegetation Index (near infra-red/green; [31]) has successfully been applied in several studies for deriving crop chlorophyll content [24,[53][54][55]. Research by Wang et al [56] involved the analysis of winter wheat spectral reflectance under different N applications and demonstrated that bands centred around the green and near-infrared spectral regions were sensitive to the treatments, whereas the blue band was comparatively less sensitive.…”
Section: Sentinel-2 Bands and Gpr Modelling For Parameter Retrievalsmentioning
confidence: 99%