2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploiting the semantic graph for the representation and retrieval of medical documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results and discussion of proposed DPCA-MGAC technique and existing methods are described with various performance metrics such as precision, false positive rate and time complexity. With the help of these parametric analysis, the comparison between three methods namely DPCA-MGAC technique, GSRM and LKNN is performed [9], [10]. The comparison results of three methods are explained in following section.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results and discussion of proposed DPCA-MGAC technique and existing methods are described with various performance metrics such as precision, false positive rate and time complexity. With the help of these parametric analysis, the comparison between three methods namely DPCA-MGAC technique, GSRM and LKNN is performed [9], [10]. The comparison results of three methods are explained in following section.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A semi-supervised spectral clustering method was introduced for grouping the MEDLINE Documents [9]. However, error rate was not considered in that for improving their performance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is a need to rank the document based on the popularity because there are a number of documents available online for the single query that makes it difficult for the user to retrieve relevant information [3]. The web provides enormous information easily than searching for relevant information in local libraries [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%