2011
DOI: 10.1142/s0219498811005099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploration of Finite-Dimensional Kac Algebras and Lattices of Intermediate Subfactors of Irreducible Inclusions

Abstract: Abstract. We study the four infinite families KA(n), KB(n), KD(n), KQ(n) of finite dimensional Hopf (in fact Kac) algebras constructed respectively by A. Masuoka and L. Vainerman: isomorphisms, automorphism groups, self-duality, lattices of coideal subalgebras. We reduce the study to KD(n) by proving that the others are isomorphic to KD(n), its dual, or an index 2 subalgebra of KD(2n). We derive many examples of lattices of intermediate subfactors of the inclusions of depth 2 associated to those Kac algebras, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that recently lattices of intermediate for other types of Kac algebras have been obtained in [6]. Our conjecture can be verified in the examples of [6] where complete lattice of intermediate subfactors are determined.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that recently lattices of intermediate for other types of Kac algebras have been obtained in [6]. Our conjecture can be verified in the examples of [6] where complete lattice of intermediate subfactors are determined.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…We note that recently lattices of intermediate for other types of Kac algebras have been obtained in [6]. Our conjecture can be verified in the examples of [6] where complete lattice of intermediate subfactors are determined. The maximal (or minimal) coideals are very few compared with the dimension of the Kac algebra in these examples of [6].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 63%