2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2cp23784a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring chemistry with the fragment molecular orbital method

Abstract: The fragment molecular orbital (FMO) method makes possible nearly linear scaling calculations of large molecular systems, such as water clusters, proteins and DNA. In particular, FMO has been widely used in biochemical applications involving protein-ligand binding and drug design. The method has been efficiently parallelized suitable for petascale computing. Many commonly used wave functions and solvent models have been interfaced with FMO. We review the historical background of FMO, and summarize its method d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
366
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 352 publications
(372 citation statements)
references
References 250 publications
(287 reference statements)
5
366
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These developments have taken place aiming to overcome limitations of the original schemes and provide more chemical significance to the energy components, which are not uniquely defined. We can cite, for example, CSOV (Constrained Space Orbital Variations) [107], RVS (Reduced Variational Space Self-Consistent-Field) [108], SAPT (Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory) [109], NEDA (Natural Energy Decomposition Analysis) [110][111][112], LMOEDA (Localized Molecular Orbital Energy Decomposition Analysis) [113], ALMO-EDA (Absolutely Localized Molecular Orbital [114]), FMO (Fragment Molecular Orbital [115][116][117]) and a Morokuma-type EDA developed by Ziegler and Rauk [118][119][120]. Certainly, this list is not exhaustive, but recalls some popular currently used EDA schemes.…”
Section: Energy Decomposition Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These developments have taken place aiming to overcome limitations of the original schemes and provide more chemical significance to the energy components, which are not uniquely defined. We can cite, for example, CSOV (Constrained Space Orbital Variations) [107], RVS (Reduced Variational Space Self-Consistent-Field) [108], SAPT (Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory) [109], NEDA (Natural Energy Decomposition Analysis) [110][111][112], LMOEDA (Localized Molecular Orbital Energy Decomposition Analysis) [113], ALMO-EDA (Absolutely Localized Molecular Orbital [114]), FMO (Fragment Molecular Orbital [115][116][117]) and a Morokuma-type EDA developed by Ziegler and Rauk [118][119][120]. Certainly, this list is not exhaustive, but recalls some popular currently used EDA schemes.…”
Section: Energy Decomposition Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixed QM/MM schemes [171], widely used to model large systems, can significantly improve protein-ligand binding prediction directly, through explicit energy calculations [172], or indirectly [173] by re-calculating ligand's atomic charges in an attempt to model ligand polarization effects. An alternative, more accurate but slower approach to large systems, is the fragment molecular orbital (FMO) method [174]. FMO divides a system in N non-overlapping fragments (e.g.…”
Section: Protein-ligand Binding Redesignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Exceptions to this include use of the fragment molecular orbital (FMO) framework [39][40][41] in schemes such as the PIEDA. 42 Recently, work has been published 43 investigating 18 class A GPCR-ligand crystal structures using the FMO-MP2 (second order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory) 44 PIEDA method with the 6-31G* basis set, demonstrating the components of the interactions and hence the high suitability of EDA to the field of drug design especially in the case of large drug-protein systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%