2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2020.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring climate-driven non-economic loss and damage in the Pacific Islands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through these findings and previous studies (McNamara et al 2021a , b ), we put forward that biodiversity loss assessments—whether they are standalone or in-built to existing vulnerability assessments—should be a priority research area. Particular attention to the interactions within the socio-ecological system, and flow-on effects to Pasifika wellbeing, livelihoods and culture, among other elements need to be embedded into both biodiversity and ecosystem services assessments as well as research around loss in the Pacific, which is lacking to date (McNamara et al 2021a , b ). These assessments need to incorporate social science expertise, appreciating that biodiversity loss has direct links to other cascading losses that need to be captured and focused on.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Through these findings and previous studies (McNamara et al 2021a , b ), we put forward that biodiversity loss assessments—whether they are standalone or in-built to existing vulnerability assessments—should be a priority research area. Particular attention to the interactions within the socio-ecological system, and flow-on effects to Pasifika wellbeing, livelihoods and culture, among other elements need to be embedded into both biodiversity and ecosystem services assessments as well as research around loss in the Pacific, which is lacking to date (McNamara et al 2021a , b ). These assessments need to incorporate social science expertise, appreciating that biodiversity loss has direct links to other cascading losses that need to be captured and focused on.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…It showcased “numerous lived experiences with climate-related harm”, such as losses to culture and traditions, physical and mental health, sense of place and social fabric as well as identity and dignity, among others (Tschakert et al 2019 , p. 69). McNamara et al ( 2021a ) conducted a systematic review to understand what was already known about non-economic loss and damage (NELD) (i.e. those irreducible to economic terms) in the Pacific Islands region and concluded that: “[n]on-economic loss and damage induced by climate change in the Pacific Islands region has been reported as fears of cultural loss, deterioration of vital ecosystem services, and dislocation from ancestral lands, among others”.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Science and policy negotiations on Loss and Damage [2] have evolved at the UNFCCC, with Article 8 of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change explicitly requiring the urgent need to address non-economic loss and damage that often disproportionately impacts vulnerable populations (UNFCCC 2015; McNamara et al 2021). Empirical cases from vulnerable societies illustrate the increasing severity of environmental and climatic impacts on people with likely limits to adapt (Huggel et al 2015; Barnett et al 2015;Mechler and Schinko 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NELDs refer to the climate-related losses that cannot be traded easily in the market, are inclusive of both material and non-material losses, and experienced by the most affected by climate change (UNFCCC 2013; Morrisey and Oliver-Smith 2013). NELD impacts reported in the literature to date include elements that cannot be easily economically monetised such as loss of cultural heritage, human health and lives, local knowledge, as well as human displacement and mobility (Barnett et al 2016;McNamara et al 2016McNamara et al , 2021Preston 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a recent article by Parsons and Nielsen shows, the "subjective positionality and marginality" of individuals play a key role in the relationship between climate and migration because environmental factors are "entangled in a variety of other socioeconomic characteristics and processes, from age to gender to education" (2020,12). As such, even though ethnographic, "cultural" (Farbotko and McMichael 2019;Parsons 2019;McNamara, Westoby, and Chandra 2021) or socio-psychological perspectives (Adams 2016;Koubi et al 2016) have made their way to the field of environmental mobilities, there is still much to explore regarding the importance of individual risk perceptions, positionalities, preferences, and values in mediating the relationship between climate and migration (see Parsons 2019 for a critical review). The relation between populations and their environment is multifaceted and comprised of multiple mundane practices.…”
Section: Toward a Multifaceted View Of Human-environment Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%