2021
DOI: 10.1111/jmi.13046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and fluorescence staining as a tool for imaging and quantifying traces of marine microbioerosion and their trace‐making microendoliths

Abstract: Microscopic organisms that penetrate calcareous structures by actively dissolving the carbonate matrix, namely microendoliths, have an important influence on the breakdown of marine carbonates. The study of these microorganisms and the bioerosion traces they produce is crucial for understanding the impact of their bioeroding activity on the carbonate recycling in environments under global climate change. Traditionally, either the extracted microendoliths were studied by conventional microscopy or their traces … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimation of microborer filaments (Lukas, 1973;Priess et al, 2000) or traces (Chazottes et al, 1995;Carreiro-Silva et al, 2005) depends also on the observer, thus limiting comparisons of results. In the light of the new techniques developed recently by Salamon et al (2019) and Schätzle et al (2021) which combine specific fluorescent dyes and SEM or Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) we believe that our method could be improved to quantify the abundance of a larger variety of microboring traces as here only two types were studied with the machine learning approach. Our method was limited by the grayscale SEM images reducing the ability of the CNN model to distinguish properly the various types of traces.…”
Section: Microboring Assemblage Of Diploastrea Sp: Study Methods and ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of microborer filaments (Lukas, 1973;Priess et al, 2000) or traces (Chazottes et al, 1995;Carreiro-Silva et al, 2005) depends also on the observer, thus limiting comparisons of results. In the light of the new techniques developed recently by Salamon et al (2019) and Schätzle et al (2021) which combine specific fluorescent dyes and SEM or Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) we believe that our method could be improved to quantify the abundance of a larger variety of microboring traces as here only two types were studied with the machine learning approach. Our method was limited by the grayscale SEM images reducing the ability of the CNN model to distinguish properly the various types of traces.…”
Section: Microboring Assemblage Of Diploastrea Sp: Study Methods and ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the analysis of microborings is a key tool in deciphering the microbiome of biogenic carbonates, such as fossil corals or mollusc shells (e.g. Salamon et al ., 2019; Schätzle et al ., 2021; Salamon & Kołodziej, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%