2021
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-14-4641-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring deep learning for air pollutant emission estimation

Abstract: Abstract. The inaccuracy of anthropogenic emission inventories on a high-resolution scale due to insufficient basic data is one of the major reasons for the deviation between air quality model and observation results. A bottom-up approach, which is a typical emission inventory estimation method, requires a lot of human labor and material resources, whereas a top-down approach focuses on individual pollutants that can be measured directly as well as relying heavily on traditional numerical modeling. Lately, the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The VAE-encoder employs the same model structure as the VAE-decoder, but the NO x emission replaces the current-day NO 2 as the output of the VAE-encoder, and the latter becomes one of its features. The model structure is nearly identical to that used in our previous study, , with the exception that we exclude VOC emissions from the features, which may have uncertainties but for which there are currently very few observations. Further studies are recommended to constrain both NO x and VOC emissions at the same time using additional observations such as HCHO and O 3 concentrations retrieved from satellites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VAE-encoder employs the same model structure as the VAE-decoder, but the NO x emission replaces the current-day NO 2 as the output of the VAE-encoder, and the latter becomes one of its features. The model structure is nearly identical to that used in our previous study, , with the exception that we exclude VOC emissions from the features, which may have uncertainties but for which there are currently very few observations. Further studies are recommended to constrain both NO x and VOC emissions at the same time using additional observations such as HCHO and O 3 concentrations retrieved from satellites.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meteorology and nonlinear atmospheric chemistry complicate the attribution of air quality responses to changes in precursor emissions . For example, despite unprecedented reductions in anthropogenic emissions during the COVID-19 lockdown, increases in O 3 concentrations were widely observed in urban areas worldwide. On the other hand, PM 2.5 also did not always decline, as it can be enhanced through secondary formation under unfavorable occasions (e.g., higher humidity, enhanced O 3 ). , Chemical transport models (CTMs) are used widely to simulate air pollutant concentrations under different emission and meteorological conditions. ,, However, CTMs rely highly on the accuracy and resolution of uncertain emission inventories and are computationally expensive for instant air quality management . Machine learning (ML)-based approaches have more flexibility and efficiency in leveraging real-world data and are good at capturing complicated nonlinear relationships .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy and generalization ability of the model is further explained through the three largest urban agglomerations in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River [12]. Huang et al (2021) proposed a new method to simulate the dual relationship between emission inventory and pollution concentration for emission inventory estimation [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%