2010
DOI: 10.1080/14775085.2010.513148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Destination Image, Experience and Revisit Intention: A Comparison of Sport and Non-Sport Tourist Perceptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
91
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
7
91
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, a positive DI does not assure a positive RI. Perhaps satisfied travelers also prefer new destinations in the future (Chen & Funk, 2010). Finally, in the case of event sports travelers in the US it was found that DI has no direct influence on intention to participate in the event again, therefore it has a negative impact (Kaplanidou & Gibson, 2010).…”
Section: Destination Image (Di)mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, a positive DI does not assure a positive RI. Perhaps satisfied travelers also prefer new destinations in the future (Chen & Funk, 2010). Finally, in the case of event sports travelers in the US it was found that DI has no direct influence on intention to participate in the event again, therefore it has a negative impact (Kaplanidou & Gibson, 2010).…”
Section: Destination Image (Di)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Interestingly, another study has looked at sports tourism in the US and illustrated that DI positively influenced intentions to visit a destination. It also stated that DI plays a vital role when travelers decide to visit a destination for the first time (Chen & Funk, 2010;Kaplanidou & Vogt, 2007). Certainly, in the tourism literature, DI has been connected to RI and more recently in the literature of sport tourism, image has been connected with RI (Kaplanidou & Gibson, 2010).…”
Section: Destination Image (Di)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Interest in loyalty studies is increasing in the field of tourism, as people who tend to stay longer in one location (Oppermann, 1998) provide better word of mouth (Oppermann, 2000) and spend more (Shoemaker & Lewis, 1999). Thus, several scientific studies have sought to understand this phenomenon (Chen & Funk, 2010;Um, Chon, & Ro, 2006) by showing that different antecedents can influence destination revisit intentions. One such antecedent is perceived value (hedonic and utilitarian).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of this sampling method was adequate as it was in line with several other travel motivation studies especially in the general tourism research (Hsu & Huang, 2012;Li, Wen & Leung, 2011;Jonsson & Devonish, 2009;Snepeger et al, 2006) and sport tourism research (Yusof et al, 2012;Yusof & Shah, 2007;Yusof, Shah, Omar-Fauzee, & Hakim, 2008;Chang & Hsu, 2012;Chen & Funk, 2010;Funk, Toohey & Bruun, 2007). Based on this sampling method, data was gathered from a total of 106 subjects visiting Sipadan Island in Sabah, Malaysia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%