2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring e-Procurement Value for Construction Companies in Malaysia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the anticipated benefits of the eprocurement system, studies have revealed some probable challenges are likely to be faced during its full implementation [26]. Hashim et al [42] noted that, the challenges to e-procurement inhibit the use of this platform and thus yield negative outcomes. Eadie et al [43] added that, these challenges should be eliminated since they prevent the smooth implementation of the eprocurement system.…”
Section: Challenges To E-procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the anticipated benefits of the eprocurement system, studies have revealed some probable challenges are likely to be faced during its full implementation [26]. Hashim et al [42] noted that, the challenges to e-procurement inhibit the use of this platform and thus yield negative outcomes. Eadie et al [43] added that, these challenges should be eliminated since they prevent the smooth implementation of the eprocurement system.…”
Section: Challenges To E-procurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenges faced during implementation often cause failures to meet the stated organizational objectives. This may be attributed to the highly fragmented ICT usage within the sector [33] and slowness in adopting ICT innovations due to the high capital investment involved [19,20]. Likewise, Rankin et al [24] advocate that the AEC organizations inherited the following challenges: "fragmentation, highly pragmatic, cost conscious, little institutional leadership, and no standards in technology and business models."…”
Section: E-procurement and Construction Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding the significant value of e-procurement to business practices, low adoption of e-procurement has been reported by various research across different industries (e.g., Au et al [16] in hospitality; Mettler and Rohner [10] in healthcare; Toktaş-Palut et al [1] in retail business; and Vitrauskaite and Gatautis [17] in construction). It is also worthwhile noting that little headway has been made in research pertaining to architecture engineering and construction (AEC) firms, which has led to the limited development of research frameworks to uncover the critical success factors (CSFs) responsible for e-procurement implementation [18,19]. Recent studies in the construction industry of developing countries by Altayyar and Beaumont-Kerridgea [20] in Saudi Arabia, Aduwo et al [21] and Afolabi et al [22] in Nigeria, and Ibem and Laryea [23] in South Africa further echoed the limited use of e-procurement practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has resulted in the increasing adoption of web-based technologies and transaction processes in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry. The benefits of web-based technologies in construction supply chain management have been identified to include increase in process quality and flexibility, reduction in procurement cost and time, increase user satisfaction, improved customer service and managerial effectiveness; reduction in errors, fraud and corruption as well as promoting faster response time [5], [6]- [10].…”
Section: E O Ibem E B Aduwo E a Ayo-vaughanmentioning
confidence: 99%