2022
DOI: 10.1108/ajim-08-2021-0216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring factors affecting mobile-banking app adoption: a perspective from adaptive structuration theory

Abstract: PurposeThe study has two aims: first, it aimed to investigate the impact of contextual factors (such as information quality, service quality, system quality, trust in applications (app) and COVID-19 health anxiety) on the intention to use the Mobile Payment (MP) app, and subsequently, the actual use of the app. Second, the aim of this study is whether the COVID-19 threat has a moderating influence on the relationship between customers' intent to use MP app and the actual use of MP app.Design/methodology/approa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…User satisfaction has a positive impact on users’ continued use intention. Ali et al (2022) found that system quality is positively related to users’ intention to use mobile applications, that is, service quality affects users’ actual use of mobile applications. Their research confirms the positive impact of mobile applications on customer service and customer satisfaction.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…User satisfaction has a positive impact on users’ continued use intention. Ali et al (2022) found that system quality is positively related to users’ intention to use mobile applications, that is, service quality affects users’ actual use of mobile applications. Their research confirms the positive impact of mobile applications on customer service and customer satisfaction.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lin (2018) thinks that information disseminators (subject image, serviceability, service consciousness), the WeChat media platform (information utility, content quality, push frequency), noise interference (group interference, interest interference, publicity interference, competition interference), and information recipients (reading quantity, attention quantity, praise quantity, and forwarding quantity) impact promotion effect. Ali et al (2022) found that system quality is positively related to users’ intention to use mobile applications, that is, service quality affects users’ actual use of mobile applications. Their research confirms the positive impact of mobile applications on customer service and customer satisfaction.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Research Topic enables management, social media, and psychology researchers to explore the impact of social media on the mental health, productivity, and performance of workers, professionals, business people, and students all over the world (Obrenovic et al, 2020 ; Zheng et al, 2020 ; Zhao and Zhou, 2021 ). During COVID-19, various scholars have observed positive aspects of social media use, particularly in developing more sophisticated and user-friendly applications for working from home and improved services in e-banking, e-learning, and e-commerce (Zheng et al, 2020 ; Khan, 2021 ; Ali et al, 2022 ). On the other hand, some scholars have pointed out that excessive use of social media has caused information overload (Liu et al, 2021 ), technostress (Nimrod, 2022 ), and fake news bombardment during COVID-19 (Pennycook et al, 2020 ), negatively impacting people's mental health (Zhao and Zhou, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering previous studies on social media and COVID-19 (Islam et al, 2020;Masood et al, 2021;Ali et al, 2022), we controlled variables including age, gender, education level, profession, and social media usage frequency to generate more robust results.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we conducted two CFA tests and compared the fit indices. The results reveal that the hypothesized fivefactor model better fits the data (χ2 = 512.33, df = 281, RMSEA = 0.05, GFI = 0.90, CFI = 0.97, and TLI = 0.96) than the alternative single-factor model in which all constructs were combined into a single factor (χ2 = 3612.72, df = 291, RMSEA = 0.18, GFI = 0.47 CFI = 0.52, and TLI = 0.47) (Ali et al, 2022). Moreover, significant moderating effects also mitigate the possibility of common method bias (Siemsen et al, 2010).…”
Section: Measurement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%