2022
DOI: 10.1155/2022/6657486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring for Route Preferences of Subway Passengers Using Smart Card and Train Log Data

Abstract: As the mode share of the subway in Seoul has increased, the estimation of passenger travel routes has become a crucial issue to identify the congestion sections in the subway network. This paper aims to estimate the travel train of subway passengers in Seoul. The alternative routes are generated based on the train log data. The travel route is then estimated by the empirical cumulative distribution functions (ECDFs) of access time, egress time, and transfer time. The train choice probability is estimated for a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To analyze the physical distance between in-vehicle passengers intuitively beyond the absolute number of trip volumes, we estimated the routes traveled in each passenger trip, which originally consisted only of information at the departure and arrival stations. We formulated our problem using Manski’s paradigm and recalled the route estimation framework by Lee et al to estimate the routes traveled in each passenger trip by combining smart card and train log data ( 25 , 27 ). The route estimation problem, also called route choice modeling, was formulated as the random utility model proposed by Manski, as expressed in Equation 1 below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To analyze the physical distance between in-vehicle passengers intuitively beyond the absolute number of trip volumes, we estimated the routes traveled in each passenger trip, which originally consisted only of information at the departure and arrival stations. We formulated our problem using Manski’s paradigm and recalled the route estimation framework by Lee et al to estimate the routes traveled in each passenger trip by combining smart card and train log data ( 25 , 27 ). The route estimation problem, also called route choice modeling, was formulated as the random utility model proposed by Manski, as expressed in Equation 1 below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in Seoul, the number of subway cars varies with different subway lines and operating sections, necessitating the consideration of geometrical factors in physical distance analyses. For example, it has been reported that a similar number of passengers travel on Line 9 and Line 4 throughout the day ( 25 ). However, trains operating on Line 9 are composed of 4 cars, whereas the number of cars for trains operating on Line 4 is 10, meaning the physical distance between passengers is different, despite a similar number of people.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e transit network in Seoul is operated with only a 100% smart card system without any other payment method, for example, cash and ticket, and the smart card data in Seoul provides 99% of transit users' trip information. us, it is widely used for microscopic user behavior analysis [16][17][18].…”
Section: Description Of Smart Card Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the use of the ant colony algorithm to calculate the optimal tourism planning route in the study, some researchers also use the particle swarm algorithm to carry out the shortest tourism route planning; in this planning design, the authors mainly apply the principle of the particle swarm algorithm to the city of Lhasa and find the shortest distance between major popular attractions, so as to enhance the tourist experience, reduce the cost, ensure the tourists' play time and quality, and save costs for tourism companies [ 17 ].…”
Section: Current Situation Of Tourism Route Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%