Exploring gender differences in the working lives of UK hospital consultants

Abstract

Objective: Internationally, increasing numbers of women are practising medicine. Gender differences in doctors' working hours, specialty choices and communication styles are well documented, but studies often neglect contextual factors such as the role of socialised gender expectations on behaviours in the workplace and the medical profession. These may be important as recent studies have reported gender differences in doctors' activity rates that cannot be explained by specialty or contracted hours, suggesting other sources of variation. This study sought to explore the working lives of hospital doctors and how their work is negotiated according to gender and context. Design: Gender differences in the day-to-day work of hospital specialists (consultants) in the NHS were investigated using a qualitative approach, including observation and interview methods. Data were analysed inductively using qualitative observation and interview methods. Setting: Two NHS hospital trusts in England. Participants: Data were collected from 13 participants working in a variety of specialties and in a range of clinical and non-clinical settings. Main outcome measures: Various behaviours, attitudes and experiences were explored, such as doctor-patient communication, interactions with colleagues and workload. Results: Influences at both individual and situational levels, appear to affect differentially the work of male and female doctors. Female consultants described awareness of the impact of behaviours on relationships with colleagues, and their interactions appeared to be more carefully performed. Nurses and other colleagues tend to demonstrate less cooperation with female consultants. Gender differences also exist in patient communication, feelings of work-family conflict and barriers to career progression. Conclusions: These variations in hospital consultants' work may have implications for both the quantity and quality of care provided by male and female consultants. This is timely and of importance to the medical workforce as the gender composition approaches parity.

Factors associated with less-than-full-time working in medical practice: results of surveys of five cohorts of UK doctors, 10 years after graduation

“…Doctors in trainee and senior positions were less likely to work LTFT than their colleagues in other positions. This contrasts with previous studies showing larger gender differences in LTFT working rates with career progression [ 23 , 24 ]. Our finding of lower rates of LTFT working for trainees probably reflects the fact that meeting training requirements can be difficult when working LTFT.…”

Social capital in a regional inter-hospital network among trauma centers (trauma network): results of a qualitative study in Germany

“…Gender differences in consultants’ interactions with other health professionals have been described, e.g. regarding directive behavior or dominance [ 49 ], so the gender composition of a network may influence the way social capital is generated within the network. Studies on social capital from other disciplines imply that collaboration, solidarity, and reciprocity may increase in groups where women are present [ 50 ].…”

The influence of gender on clinical examination skills of medical students in Jordan: a cross-sectional study

“…This shifting composition of gender in medical schools will have an impact on teaching methods, medical culture and interaction with patients, particularly in countries where gender divisions are prominent. Gender has shown to affect medical practice [16,17], medical student experience [18] and various elements of learning [19,20] with most studies related to obstetric and gynaecology rotations [9,16,21,22]. Thus, it is not unreasonable that in contexts with prominent gender divisions, gender would have far reaching implications on clinical learning experience which would then impact how faculty should teach.…”