2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-11470-0_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Ground States of Quantum Spin Glasses by Quantum Monte Carlo Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evolving the state from t 0 to t, we get the state ρ(t), which has two terms as shown in equation (7). Now, we can numerically compute the inner product of the initial state |Ψ(0) with the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian to find the the state | Ψ(t) , and hence the detector function F n (t).…”
Section: Ising Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evolving the state from t 0 to t, we get the state ρ(t), which has two terms as shown in equation (7). Now, we can numerically compute the inner product of the initial state |Ψ(0) with the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian to find the the state | Ψ(t) , and hence the detector function F n (t).…”
Section: Ising Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems are generally studied from the quantum dynamics viewpoint, i.e. the evolution of an initial quantum many-body state through the time-dependent Schroedinger equation [7], and from a statistical mechanics viewpoint, i.e. the various thermodynamic phases and transitions [4,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Driving a system out of equilibrium is carried out in many ways. Most of the attention has been focused on quantum quenches [17], namely, sudden changes of the external parameters in the Hamiltonian controlling the unitary evolution of the closed system. One of the conventional methods of understanding the dynamics of a system after a quench is the Loschmidt echo (LE), which is a benchmark of the partial or full reappearance of the original state as a function of time [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important and long-standing question concerns the existence of the fingerprints of a QPT on higher excited states (i.e., states with finite energy density with respect to the ground state). It is known that QPT has definitive signatures in the ground-state (and low-lying states close to it), as reflected in certain ground-state properties like the derivative of ground-state entanglement (concurrence) 5 , the ground-state fidelity susceptibility (see, e.g., 6 7 8 9 10 11 ) or scaling of ground-state entanglement entropy at the critical point(see, e.g., 12 13 14 ). For a physical (local) Hamiltonian, it is not unexpected for the states moderately close to the ground state (with vanishing energy density) to retain such direct mark of the singularity on them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%