Exploring knowledge, perception of risk and biosecurity practices among researchers in the UK: a quantitative survey

Abstract

Accidental introduction and/or spread of invasive non-native species (INNS) can result from a range of activities including agriculture, transport, trade and recreation. Researchers represent an important group of stakeholders who undertake activities in the field that could potentially facilitate the spread of INNS. Biosecurity is key to preventing the introduction and spread of INNS. Risk perceptions are a fundamental component in determining behaviour, so understanding how researchers perceive the risks associated with their activities can help us understand some of the drivers of biosecurity behaviour in the field. The aim of this study was to investigate researchers' perceptions of risk in relation to their field activities and whether risk perceptions influenced behaviour. We gathered quantitative data on perceptions of risk and biosecurity practices using an online questionnaire. Only 35% of all respondents considered their field activities to pose some risk in terms of spreading INNS. Higher risk perception was found in those who undertook high risk activities or where INNS were known/expected to be present. However, whilst respondents with experience of INNS were more likely to report consciously employing biosecurity in the field, this did not translate into better actual biosecurity practices. Awareness of biosecurity campaigns did in fact increase perception of risk, perceived and actual biosecurity behaviour. However, there remains a disconnect between reported and actual biosecurity practices, including a lack of understanding about what constitutes good biosecurity practice. These findings should be used to improve targeted awareness raising campaigns and help create directed training on biosecurity practices.

Sanitation is the greatest concern in outdoor cat management but ecological message frames promote biodiversity conservation in Japan

“…We randomly assigned the respondents to three groups in order to evaluate the impact of message framing (e.g., McLeod et al 2017, Shannon et al 2019, Mameno et al 2020). The Control was not framed, and the respondents answered the BWS questions without any information.…”

A Tourism Biosecurity Destination Planning and Management Model

“…Biosecurity campaigns such as 'check, clean, dry' have been utilised most notably in New Zealand in helping to control the spread of Didymosphenia Geminata (Didymo) (Anderson et al, 2014). However, these campaigns' effectiveness can vary due to differing risk perception from tourists (Shannon et al, 2019) or a lack of relevant knowledge of recommended biosecurity measures (Cole et al, 2018). Due to the misalignment of conservation priorities (Maria Gstaettner et al, 2017) it is crucial that tourism planners and policymakers align their dimensions of biosecurity risk when developing vector mitigation measures through transparent communication and tourist awareness.…”

The effectiveness of e-Learning on biosecurity practice to slow the spread of invasive alien species

“…Field researchers are an important group of stakeholders that undertake activities in the aquatic and terrestrial environment (e.g. surveying and sampling), which could potentially bring them into contact with IAS (knowingly or unknowingly) and facilitate their spread (Shannon et al 2018b;Sutcliffe et al 2018). Field researchers therefore represent an important group of individuals that would benefit from e-Learning training.…”