2014
DOI: 10.1080/03069400.2014.967954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring legal ethics using student generated storyboards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Thirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence video (Jordan et al 2016), direct instruction of others (Alaimo et al 2010;Hickey and Pontrello 2016), storyboards (Colbran and Gilding 2014), and flashcards (Colbran et al 2017).…”
Section: Student-generated Instructional Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Thirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence video (Jordan et al 2016), direct instruction of others (Alaimo et al 2010;Hickey and Pontrello 2016), storyboards (Colbran and Gilding 2014), and flashcards (Colbran et al 2017).…”
Section: Student-generated Instructional Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through project-based learning, students learn diverse design skills by solving real-world problems. With this approach, the student engagement is increased as they move from passive learners to content creators, known as "learning by doing" (Colbran et al 2014). The ELPID (E-Learning Platform for Innovative Product Development) project is based on long-term experience with virtual collaborative NPD (New Product Development) courses and design education research gained through continuous delivery of project-based learning courses by six European universities forming an academic virtual enterprise together with selected industrial partners (Vukašinović and Pavković, 2017).…”
Section: Project-based Npd Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De opdracht was het maken van een storyboard, inclusief een titel en leerdoelen voor de animatie, aangevuld met door de studenten opgestelde meerkeuzevragen met goede en foute antwoorden. Blijkens het door Collbran en Gilding uitgevoerde onderzoek leidde deze creatieve taak inderdaad tot analyses en discussies van ethische kwesties in groepsverband (zie Collbran & Gilding, 2014: 296 e.v. ).…”
Section: 14unclassified