2021 7th International Workshop on Data Analysis and Reduction for Big Scientific Data (DRBSD-7) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/drbsd754563.2021.00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Lossy Compressibility through Statistical Correlations of Scientific Datasets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a few works have investigated spatial and temporal statistical predictors of CR. In Krasowska et al (2021), global and local spatial correlation ranges that are estimated via a variogram are explored as candidate statistical predictors for CR. No CR-prediction setup is proposed, however; and, as shown in Figure 4, the spatial correlation on its own is insufficient to fully characterize 2D slices in terms of CR.…”
Section: Existing Methods For Cr Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, a few works have investigated spatial and temporal statistical predictors of CR. In Krasowska et al (2021), global and local spatial correlation ranges that are estimated via a variogram are explored as candidate statistical predictors for CR. No CR-prediction setup is proposed, however; and, as shown in Figure 4, the spatial correlation on its own is insufficient to fully characterize 2D slices in terms of CR.…”
Section: Existing Methods For Cr Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaussian samples of type 4 are the most challenging because correlation scales are picked randomly and aggregated with spatial weights creating samples with strong spatial heterogeneity that may not be encountered in most continuous scientific simulations. These samples challenge the chosen statistical predictors and highlight the need to account for heterogeneous multiscale information, as pointed out by Krasowska et al (2021). SZ shows higher errors for samples of Type 1 than for the other sample types, this is due to the fact that CRs observed in Type 1 samples have a much wider range than the other ones, hence larger prediction errors.…”
Section: Cr Predictions For Different Types Of Gaussian Samplesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations