Exploring medically-related Canadian summer student research programs: a National Cross-sectional Survey Study

Abstract

Background Summer student research programs (SSRPs) serve to generate student interest in research and a clinician-scientist career path. This study sought to understand the composition of existing medically-related Canadian SSRPs, describe the current selection, education and evaluation practices and highlight opportunities for improvement. Methods A cross-sectional survey study among English-language-based medically-related Canadian SSRPs for undergraduate and medical students was conducted. Programs were systematically identified through academic and/or institutional websites. The survey, administered between June–August 2016, collected information on program demographics, competition, selection, student experience, and program self-evaluation. Results Forty-six of 91 (50.5%) identified programs responded. These SSRPs collectively offered 1842 positions with a mean 3.76 applicants per placement. Most programs (78.3%, n = 36/46) required students to independently secure a research supervisor. A formal curriculum existed among 61.4% ( n = 27/44) of programs. Few programs (5.9%, n = 2/34) offered an integrated clinical observership. Regarding evaluation, 11.4% ( n = 5/44) of programs tracked subsequent research productivity and 27.5% ( n = 11/40) conducted long-term impact assessments. Conclusions Canadian SSRPs are highly competitive with the responsibility of selection primarily with the individual research supervisor rather than a centralized committee. Most programs offered students opportunities to develop both research and communication skills. Presently, the majority of programs do not have a sufficient evaluation component. These findings indicate that SSRPs may benefit from refinement of selection processes and more robust evaluation of their utility. To address this challenge, the authors describe a logic model that provides a set of core outcomes which can be applied as a framework to guide program evaluation of SSRPs. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1577-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Training and assessing undergraduate medical students’ research: Learning, engagement and experiences of students and staff

“…Globally, the incorporation of research training into undergraduate medical curricula varies from students engaging in elective research activities to their enrolment in mandatory modules. 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 The benefits of early exposure to research, and its value as an important undergraduate competence that needs to be developed, are widely reported. 3 , 7 , 8 Undergraduate medical students have traditionally not been exposed to or involved in conducting research.…”

Training New Research Trainers: an Open Science and Medical Education Innovative Experience

“…Although these specific medical graduation policies offer guidance to develop critical scientific maturity amidst future physicians, previous studies exhibit the need to provide more educational opportunities for research [41][42][43]. Correspondingly, our workshop represents an extracurricular activity to foster research teaching and enable students to detect health system needs from an in-depth perspective.…”

Sustainable Clinical Academic Training Pathways: A framework for implementation in Oman

“…Studentships are a popular form of short-term supervised research experiences available to medical students in several countries. 9 , 19 , 35 Typically, students spend between 8–16 weeks of their summer vacation working on a research project. 9 , 19 , 35 Short-term research projects provide students with a chance to meaningfully contribute to the mainstream medical literature, with research showing that approximately one-third of studentships result in subsequent peer-reviewed publications.…”