Exploring mobile mixed reality in healthcare higher education: A systematic review

Stretton, Todd; Cochrane, Thomas; Narayan, Vickel

doi:10.25304/rlt.v26.2131

Cited by 47 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 38 publications

(144 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The quality of selected papers was assessed using the mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) [41]. The MMAT is effective as it is designed to appraise the most common types of empirical studies including qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies [42]. The MMAT is based on constructionist theory and has already been used by more than 100 systematic mixed study reviews The assessment process starts from responding to the following two screening questions.…”

Section: Studies Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Management and leadership competence for hospital managers: a systematic review and best fit framework synthesis

Kakemam¹,

Liang²,

Janati³

et al. 2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Competent managers are vital to the productivity and service quality of healthcare organizations and the sustainability of the healthcare system including hospitals. The purpose of this study is to synthesize the evidence related competency to management and leadership in healthcare organizations including hospitals through the Best Fit Method. Methods A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies focusing on confirming and/or assessing the competency requirements of health service managers in particular hospital managers. The following electronic databases were searched from January 2000 and December 2018: ISI/Web of Sciences, PubMed, Scopus, Emerald, and the Scientific Information Database. Applying the Best Fit Framework Synthesis Method, we mapped all of the competency and associating behavioral items against the validated MCAP management competency framework which includes 6 core competencies, 18 subthemes and 83 associating behavioural items. Results Eleven studies were identified for inclusion in the review. The mapping of the competencies and relevant items identified in these studies with the validated MCAP management competency framework and associating items confirm that the MCAP framework has vastly represented findings of all recent studies. Although the MCAP framework incorporated behavioral items associating with the competency of Professionalism into the six core competencies, the study found the necessity of treating Professionalism as an independent competency to be included in the global management competency framework for health service managers, in particular hospital managers. As a result, the proposed Global Management Competency Framework includes the following 7 competencies: evidence-informed decision making, operations, administration and resource management, knowledge of healthcare environment and the organization, interpersonal, communication qualities and relationship management, leading people and organisation, enabling and managing change, and professionalism. Conclusions This review and the mapping of the competencies identified in previous studies with the validated MCAP framework resulted in the recommendation of Global Management Competency Framework for health service managers. It provides useful guidance to the formulation of training and development direction for the health service management workforce. However, since management competencies are context sensitive, in order to developing a more targeted approach or target curriculum for the development managers from different sectors, management levels, validation is recommended.

show abstract

Section: Studies Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Management and leadership competence for hospital managers: a systematic review and best fit framework synthesis

Kakemam¹,

Liang²,

Janati³

et al. 2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In a 2018 systematic review of the literature (Stretton, Cochrane, and Narayan 2018), the authors identified a general lack of engagement with critical learning theory and the development of higher level critical thinking and creativity in the design of clinical simulation environments. The literature evidences that the design of clinical simulation learning environments is predominantly based around the development of learner core practice-based competencies.…”

Section: Pedagogical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

MESH360: a framework for designing MMR-enhanced clinical simulations

Cochrane

Aiello

Cook³

et al. 2020

Research in Learning Technology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article evaluates the results of two prototype iterations of a design-based research project that explores the application of mobile mixed reality (MMR) to enhance critical care clinical health education simulation in Paramedicine. The project utilises MMR to introduce critical elements of patient and practitioner risk and stress into clinical simulation learning scenarios to create more authentic learning environments. Subjective participant feedback is triangulated against participant biometric data to validate the level of participant stress introduced to clinical simulation through the addition of MMR. Results show a positive impact on the learning experience for both novice and professional paramedic practitioners. The article highlights the development of implementation and data triangulation methodologies that can be utilised to enhance wider clinical simulation contexts than the original context of Paramedicine education. We argue that our collaborative transdisciplinary design team model provides a transferable framework for designing MMR-enhanced clinical simulation environments.

show abstract

“…In their paper "Exploring Mobile Mixed Reality in Healthcare Higher Education: A Systematic Review", Stretton et al, (2018) describe the results of a systematic review of the literature surrounding mobile learning and mixed reality in healthcare higher education. From an initial 1484 studies 18 were identified that met the inclusion criteria focused on "healthcare", "higher education", "mobile learning" and "mixed reality".…”

Section: A Systematic Review Of Mmr In Health Educationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Special Issue on Mobile Mixed Reality

Cochrane¹,

Smart²,

Narayan³

2018

Research in Learning Technology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This special collection of Research In Learning Technology explores the state of the art of mobile mixed reality (MMR) in education. The special collection includes eight articles that cover; a systematic review of MMR in healthcare higher education, using mobile devices for connecting people to places, and a variety of case studies of implementing MMR in educational contexts. The range of papers illustrates the emergence of MMR as a platform for designing authentic learning environments in both formal and informal learning situations. The papers also highlight a general lack of engagement with new learning theories and models in the use of MMR to design transformative learning experiences.

show abstract

Exploring mobile mixed reality in healthcare higher education: A systematic review

Cited by 47 publications

References 38 publications

Management and leadership competence for hospital managers: a systematic review and best fit framework synthesis

Management and leadership competence for hospital managers: a systematic review and best fit framework synthesis

MESH360: a framework for designing MMR-enhanced clinical simulations

Special Issue on Mobile Mixed Reality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About