Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2016
DOI: 10.1145/3033701.3033728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring new formats of the Self-Assessment Manikin in the design with children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
21

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…First, users often misunderstand the depicted emotions. Especially children have difficulties understanding the SAM ( Yusoff et al, 2013 ; Hayashi et al, 2016 ). While the valence dimension of the SAM is quite intuitive (depicted as the figure’s facial expression going from a frown to a smile), the dominance dimension (depicted as the size of the figure) is much harder to explain, and the arousal dimension (depicted as an “explosion” in the stomach area) is often misinterpreted ( Broekens and Brinkman, 2013 ; Betella and Verschure, 2016 ; Chen et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, users often misunderstand the depicted emotions. Especially children have difficulties understanding the SAM ( Yusoff et al, 2013 ; Hayashi et al, 2016 ). While the valence dimension of the SAM is quite intuitive (depicted as the figure’s facial expression going from a frown to a smile), the dominance dimension (depicted as the size of the figure) is much harder to explain, and the arousal dimension (depicted as an “explosion” in the stomach area) is often misinterpreted ( Broekens and Brinkman, 2013 ; Betella and Verschure, 2016 ; Chen et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To make the SAM more accessible to children, Hayashi et al (2016) replaced the cartoon characters with emoji. Their five-point “emoti-SAM” was quickly grasped by children and effectively used as both an online and a paper version.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of potential modifications and avenues for further explorations that are entailed by our investigations. We could, for instance, speculate that using a tangible version of Self Assessment Manikin [44] with children may reduce potential bias that the experimental procedure may have introduced when capturing affective rating elicited by a tangible stimuli. Additionally, future studies could investigate the impact of the texture, weight and material of the 3D shapes (e.g.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the SAM is a validated and generally accepted tool, it has some practical drawbacks. The emotions it depicts are often misunderstood [ 41 , 42 ]. Although the valence scale of the SAM is quite intuitive (the mannikin’s facial expression varies from a frown to a smile), its arousal dimension (depicted as an ‘explosion’ in the mannikin’s stomach) is frequently misinterpreted [ 43 45 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%