2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2007.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring processes of collaborative creativity—The role of emotions in children's joint creative writing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0
10

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
47
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In what follows, we will outline the two phases which the current paper mainly focuses on: creative content generation and reviewing. (For a more detailed discussion of the analytic framework see Vass 2007aVass , 2004Vass , 2003. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In what follows, we will outline the two phases which the current paper mainly focuses on: creative content generation and reviewing. (For a more detailed discussion of the analytic framework see Vass 2007aVass , 2004Vass , 2003. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because according to Dobao (2012), cooperative writing makes students think and argue over the writings they have written. This joint discovery process facilitates the writing process by helping to structure the writing (Vass, 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no written erasure on paper which would indicate "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvz" was erased and substituted for "alphabetical order" (it could certainly have happened), but the presence of the oral erasure at this point in the manuscript is evidence of why the children wrote "alphabetical order" instead of a different term. This aspect of the textual genesis of the creation process and of the ongoing manuscript is neither observed by works that discuss the interaction between children when writing a text together (Daiute & Dalton, 1993;Vass, 2007), nor by the investigation on conversational writing (Gaulmyn, 1994;Bouchard & Gaulmyn, 1997). It is also not observed by studies that discuss second language learning (Swain & Lapkin, 2002;Storch, 1999.…”
Section: Abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvz Vs Alphabetic Ordermentioning
confidence: 98%