2006
DOI: 10.1080/13645570600595264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring ‘Quality’: Research Participants’ Perspectives on Verbatim Quotations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
154
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
154
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 presents the developed framework, in which the main themes Figure 3 will be used for organizing the presentation of the findings in the following subsections. Verbatim quotations from the participants answers will be used for illustrating their perceptions (Corden & Sainsbury, 2006), which were used for developing substantial themes during the data analysis process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3 presents the developed framework, in which the main themes Figure 3 will be used for organizing the presentation of the findings in the following subsections. Verbatim quotations from the participants answers will be used for illustrating their perceptions (Corden & Sainsbury, 2006), which were used for developing substantial themes during the data analysis process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data analysis activities are based on inductive thematic analysis method proposed by Braun and Clarke (2006), aided with the thematic network diagrams proposed by Attride-Stirling (2002 (Corden & Sainsbury, 2006). Verbatim quotations are a common tool for increasing evidential power in qualitative research.…”
Section: Research Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, vulnerable populations may face harmful consequences if their identities are revealed, and therefore anonymity is upheld to protect this (Baez, 2002). This is particularly important given that research indicates that people often agree to take part in research on the basis of relatively low understanding of how their words will be used (Corden & Sainsbury, 2006;Graham, Grewal, & Lewis, 2007). One risk in qualitative work is deductive disclosure; that is the recognition of certain characteristics by peers or those known to the participants, or recognition on the basis of unique identifiers, and thus one option is to leave some data unpublished to maintain anonymity (Wiles et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The author was concerned that the participant may not recognise himself in her (re)presentation of his speech. Demonstrating this conflictual issue, some participants in Corden and Sainsbury's (2006) study believe that attention should not be drawn to impaired speech, whilst others were concerned about the participants' reactions to knowing the researcher had changed their speech. Notably, the first author was reluctant to omit the stutter because she believed it had significance to the focus of the research on voice.…”
Section: (Re)presenting Speech Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In capturing this, the author attempted to honour Fearne's discourse and accent, considering such nuances "sonic gems" (Oleksik & Brown, 2008, p. 163) in a study concerned with youth voice. However, there is evidence (see Corden & Sainsbury, 2006) that regional expressions present in verbatim quotations can be considered unattractive, and may lead to negative judgements about the speaker.…”
Section: (Re)presenting Speech Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%