2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2be5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Reionization-era Quasars. III. Discovery of 16 Quasars at 6.4 ≲ z ≲ 6.9 with DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys and the UKIRT Hemisphere Survey and Quasar Luminosity Function at z ∼ 6.7

Abstract: This is the third paper in a series aimed at finding reionization-era quasars with the combination of DESI Legacy imaging Surveys (DELS), the Pan-STARRS1 (PS1) Survey, and near-infrared imaging surveys, such as the UKIRT Hemisphere Survey (UHS), as well as the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) mid-infrared survey. In this paper, we describe the updated quasar candidate selection procedure, report the discovery of 16 quasars at 6.4 z6.9 from an area of ∼13,020 deg 2 , and present the quasar lumino… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
142
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(211 reference statements)
4
142
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 8 we compare the SFRD derived in this work with results from galaxy evolution models, including the predictions from the cosmological hydrodynamical IllustrisTNG simulations (Pillepich et al 2018), the SHARK semianalytic model (Pillepich et al 2018), the dashed champagne line those from the SHARK semianalytic model (Lagos et al 2018), and the dashed-dotted green line the results from the SIDES simulations (Béthermin et al 2017). Additionally, we include the density evolution of luminous quasars from Wang et al (2019a) (scaled for better visualization), which strongly resemble the shape of the SFRD from bright DSFGs with L IR > 10 12 L e illustrated by the orange dashed region. (Lagos et al 2018), and the results from the SIDES simulations (Béthermin et al 2017).…”
Section: Comparison To Other Measurements and Model Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure 8 we compare the SFRD derived in this work with results from galaxy evolution models, including the predictions from the cosmological hydrodynamical IllustrisTNG simulations (Pillepich et al 2018), the SHARK semianalytic model (Pillepich et al 2018), the dashed champagne line those from the SHARK semianalytic model (Lagos et al 2018), and the dashed-dotted green line the results from the SIDES simulations (Béthermin et al 2017). Additionally, we include the density evolution of luminous quasars from Wang et al (2019a) (scaled for better visualization), which strongly resemble the shape of the SFRD from bright DSFGs with L IR > 10 12 L e illustrated by the orange dashed region. (Lagos et al 2018), and the results from the SIDES simulations (Béthermin et al 2017).…”
Section: Comparison To Other Measurements and Model Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally speaking, and taking into account the associated uncertainties in these values, our results are in good agreement with the aforementioned studies, pointing toward a convergence between galaxy evolution models and observations. Finally, we include the density evolution of luminous (M 1450 < − 26) quasars (Wang et al 2019a) in Figure 8 (scaled for visualization). The shape of the space density of bright quasars strongly resembles that from the bright DSFGs with L IR > 10 12 L e (shaded orange region in the figure), suggesting a connection between these two populations and therefore between the onset of star formation and the growth of their massive black holes (e.g., Wall et al 2005).…”
Section: Comparison To Other Measurements and Model Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our sample consists of 31quasars in the redshift range 5.77<z<6.62 located in the southern sky (e.g., Fan et al 2001Fan et al , 2003Fan et al , 2006Willott et al 2007Willott et al , 2010Venemans et al 2013;Bañados et al 2016;Jiang et al 2016;Mazzucchelli et al 2017;Reed et al 2017;Matsuoka et al 2018;Wang et al 2019b;Yang et al 2019b). This includes all available MUSE observations of z>5.7 quasars present in the ESO Archive at the time of writing (2019 August).…”
Section: Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtain N WFIRST (z > 6) ∼ 5 × 10 4 , while restricting our attention to z > 7 we obtain N WFIRST (z > 7) ∼ 3, 000. For this order-of-magnitude estimate, we employ the Jiang et al (2016) The evolution of the LF for z 6.5 is uncertain: for the purpose of this estimate, we keep the shape of the z 6.5 LF equal to the one presented by Jiang et al (2016), while we change the overall density of quasars following the prescription by Wang et al (2019b). Note that the spatial density of quasars is expected to decline by ∼ 1 order of magnitude between z = 6.5 and z = 8.…”
Section: Probability Of Additional Lensed Sources In the Sdss Samplementioning
confidence: 99%