2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-013-9278-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring relationships among TPACK components and development of the TPACK instrument

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
83
2
25

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
83
2
25
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, it was seen that a number of TPACK scales have been developed or adapted to different groups of participants including pre-service (Baran & Canbazoglu-Bilici, 2015;Canbazoglu-Bilici, Yamak, Kavak & Guzey, 2013;Cetin & Erdogan, 2018;Dikkartin-Ovez & Akyuz, 2013;Kaya & Dag, 2013;Koehler & Mishra, 2005;Pamuk, Ergun, Cakir, Yilmaz & Ayas, 2015;Sancar-Tokmak, Incikabi & Ozgelen, 2013;Schmidt et al, 2009;Zelkowski et al, 2013) and teachers (Altun, 2013;Lee & Tsai, 2010) to investigate pre-service and in-service teachers' TPACK and its relation with different variables. As it can be seen in the literature, many of the studies concentrated on assessing pre-service teachers' understanding of TPACK but there are a few studies that focused on TPACK of teachers and basically mathematics teachers'.…”
Section: Pedagogical Content Knowledge (Pck)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, it was seen that a number of TPACK scales have been developed or adapted to different groups of participants including pre-service (Baran & Canbazoglu-Bilici, 2015;Canbazoglu-Bilici, Yamak, Kavak & Guzey, 2013;Cetin & Erdogan, 2018;Dikkartin-Ovez & Akyuz, 2013;Kaya & Dag, 2013;Koehler & Mishra, 2005;Pamuk, Ergun, Cakir, Yilmaz & Ayas, 2015;Sancar-Tokmak, Incikabi & Ozgelen, 2013;Schmidt et al, 2009;Zelkowski et al, 2013) and teachers (Altun, 2013;Lee & Tsai, 2010) to investigate pre-service and in-service teachers' TPACK and its relation with different variables. As it can be seen in the literature, many of the studies concentrated on assessing pre-service teachers' understanding of TPACK but there are a few studies that focused on TPACK of teachers and basically mathematics teachers'.…”
Section: Pedagogical Content Knowledge (Pck)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lau (2018) suggested that extended research of SMU in an academic setting and specific domain should be identified as an area for future research, especially in the context of Science Education. Previous studies (Kaya, Kaya, & Emre, 2013;Lin, Tsai, Chai, & Lee, 2013;Pamuk, Ergun, Cakir, Yilmaz, & Ayas, 2015;Schmidt et al 2009) supported that TPACK could be domainspecific. Therefore, in this study, this research would analyze the association between prospective science teachers' demographic characteristics, SMU in their school activities, and their TPACK Self-efficacy in the Indonesian context.…”
Section: Gaps In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Technological Knowledge (TK) generally includes knowledge on a wide variety of different technologies from simple technology such as a pen to advance technology (Archambault & Crippen, 2009;Ozden, Mouza, & Shinas, 2016;Schmidt et al, 2009). However, TK in the TPACK framework only specifically includes technology associated with digital platforms and computers (Mishra & Koehler, 2006).…”
Section: Tpack Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El modelo indica que existentes tres fuentes de conocimiento: disciplinar, pedagógico y tecnológico, que en interacción deben establecer las guías que debe seguir los planes de formación y en consecuencia en no centrarse únicamente en los aspectos instrumentales. Aunque revisiones del modelo recientes realizadas del modelo mediante el sistema de ecuaciones estructurales (Ay, Karada y Acat, 2015;Pamuk, Ergun, Cakir, Yilmaz, y Ayas, 2015), han puesto de manifiesto su debilidad para explicar algunas de las interacciones que se dan entre las tres dimensiones del modelo (tecnológica, pedagógica y de contenido). De todas formas, sigue siendo una propuesta válida y útil para la replantear la acción formativa de los docentes (Cejas, Navío y Barroso, 2016; Cabero-Almenara y Barroso, 2016).…”
Section: Marco Teóricounclassified