2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring relationships between climate change beliefs and energy preferences: A network analysis of the European Social Survey

Abstract: Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They further show that both curtailment and efficiency behaviors were more likely to be reported when such behaviors were perceived to be possible (high personal efficacy) and effective in mitigating climate change when employed alone (personal outcome expectancy) or as a collective (collective outcome expectancy). This supports previous findings establishing that different efficacy constructs can be empirically distinguished in terms of their contribution to pro-environmental behaviors [e.g., 43 , 44 , 70 ]. The distinct effect size of each of the significant efficacy constructs was highly similar when predicting energy curtailment behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…They further show that both curtailment and efficiency behaviors were more likely to be reported when such behaviors were perceived to be possible (high personal efficacy) and effective in mitigating climate change when employed alone (personal outcome expectancy) or as a collective (collective outcome expectancy). This supports previous findings establishing that different efficacy constructs can be empirically distinguished in terms of their contribution to pro-environmental behaviors [e.g., 43 , 44 , 70 ]. The distinct effect size of each of the significant efficacy constructs was highly similar when predicting energy curtailment behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This survey was carried out between August 2016 and December 2017, resulting in a cross-national sample population of 44.387 participants. These were chosen at random after applying the corresponding post-stratification and population weighting coefficients [54].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropogenic climate change, which is caused by production and usage of energy, inevitably affects the world by increasing the average global temperature, reducing biodiversity, harmfully impacting nature, and more. 1 Energy development is crucial to hinder climate change and prevent detrimental effects while sustaining both positive social and economic development. 2 To decrease the environmental impacts of climate change, a sustainable strategy that includes improved energy efficiency, renewable energy, and sustainable development is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropogenic climate change, which is caused by production and usage of energy, inevitably affects the world by increasing the average global temperature, reducing biodiversity, harmfully impacting nature, and more . Energy development is crucial to hinder climate change and prevent detrimental effects while sustaining both positive social and economic development .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%