2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-018-2365-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring sex differences in human health risk assessment for PFNA and PFDA using a PBPK model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The toxicokinetics of PFDA were recently examined in male and female rats by Kim et al. (). After i.v.…”
Section: Appendix C– Toxicokinetics In Experimental Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The toxicokinetics of PFDA were recently examined in male and female rats by Kim et al. (). After i.v.…”
Section: Appendix C– Toxicokinetics In Experimental Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kim et al. () investigated the tissue distribution and excretion of PFNA in rats i.v. administered PFNA at a dose of 3 mg/kg bw.…”
Section: Appendix C– Toxicokinetics In Experimental Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chapter Comment EFSA response human PBPK model that could described transfer of PFOA/PFOS compounds from breast milk to neonates, as the neonatal level of the compounds of interest was critical to the assessment. Although a number of studies are discussed in this section, Chou and Lin (2019), Kim et al (2018), Kim et al (2019) -does not appear in reference list, and Loccisano et al, 2011, it seems that none of the published models described human breast milk transfer of the PFOA/PFOS compounds. It appears that the Loccisano model was used as a starting point and modified to provide the needed predictive capability.…”
Section: Comment Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies published by Chou and Lin (2019), Kim et al (2018), Kim et al (2019) are included in Section 3.3.1.3, but the latter was missing in the reference list provided at the end of the opinion. This has now been added.…”
Section: Recommendati Onsmentioning
confidence: 99%