2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.amar.2015.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the application of the Negative Binomial–Generalized Exponential model for analyzing traffic crash data with excess zeros

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…that make the mixture distributions more closely match the dataset of excess zero observations. The results of studies using this type of approach, with models mainly including the negative binomial Lindley model (NB-L) [49], [50], negative binomial-crack model (NB-CR) [51], negative binomial-generalized index model (NB-GE) [52], Poisson generalized Gaussian [53], Poisson weighted exponential [54], [55], Poisson inverse Gaussian (PIG) [56], and negative binomial with Dirichlet process [57], have verified that the introduction of the new distributions not only explains the logic of crash occurrence but also achieves a better goodness of fit compared to the traditional crash model. For example, Geedipally et al [49] and Lord and Geedipally [50] and verified that the NB-L model has better goodness of fit than the NB model and the ZINB model.…”
Section: Crash Modeling Techniques For Excess Zero Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…that make the mixture distributions more closely match the dataset of excess zero observations. The results of studies using this type of approach, with models mainly including the negative binomial Lindley model (NB-L) [49], [50], negative binomial-crack model (NB-CR) [51], negative binomial-generalized index model (NB-GE) [52], Poisson generalized Gaussian [53], Poisson weighted exponential [54], [55], Poisson inverse Gaussian (PIG) [56], and negative binomial with Dirichlet process [57], have verified that the introduction of the new distributions not only explains the logic of crash occurrence but also achieves a better goodness of fit compared to the traditional crash model. For example, Geedipally et al [49] and Lord and Geedipally [50] and verified that the NB-L model has better goodness of fit than the NB model and the ZINB model.…”
Section: Crash Modeling Techniques For Excess Zero Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Geedipally et al [49] and Lord and Geedipally [50] and verified that the NB-L model has better goodness of fit than the NB model and the ZINB model. Vangala et al [52] fit the same dataset as Lord and Geedipally [50] using the NB-GE model, demonstrating that the NB-GE model performs comparably to the NB-L model and significantly better than the traditional NB model. Considering the a priori knowledge of the above studies, it is reasonable to develop suitable improved models based on the NB-L model to work with the excess zero-observation characteristics of expressway tunnel crash data.…”
Section: Crash Modeling Techniques For Excess Zero Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling efforts to deal with crash data with excess zeros have continued with the introduction of new distributions that are capable of handling observations with small counts and combining them with the parent distributions capturing the crash data generating process (NB distributions). These kinds of models mainly include the negative binomial Lindley (NB-L) model [40], [41], the negative binomial crack (NB-CR) model [42], the negative binomial generalized index (NB-GE) model [43], etc. Moreover, these studies also verify that the improvements of negative binomial distributions are more appropriate for actual crash frequency distributions.…”
Section: B Excess Zero Observations Of Crash Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Geedipally et al [40] modeled crash data with zero observations of 36% in Indiana and zero observations of 70% in Michigan, which verified that the NB-L model has better performance than the NB model and the ZINB model. Vangala et al [43] conducted a further analysis using the same data as that of Lord and Geedipally [41] and found that the performance of the NB-GE model was comparable with the NB-L model and significantly outperformed the traditional NB model. It should be emphasized that the above literatures, which attempt to address the excess zero observations of crash panel data, are all aimed at open roads.…”
Section: B Excess Zero Observations Of Crash Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitation of the logistic regression model is that there is no dependency assumption among the influencing risk factors. The critical values of the severity of risks for expressways are unclear [37][38][39]. The TTC distribution is uncertain in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%