2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the business logic behind CSR certifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
10

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
13
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Research celebrating controversial branding practices surfaces as assuming that brands are fundamentally morally competent (Luo et al, 2013; Mukherjee & Althuizen, 2020). By contrast, the creation of doppelganger brand images (Giesler, 2012; Thompson et al, 2006) captures perceptions of free speech boundary transgression resulting from a lack of moral sensitivity, while condemnations of brands’ communications as green or woke washing (Dahlin et al, 2020; Eilert & Nappier Cherup, 2020) signals opportunism resulting from poor moral integration, and accusations of being a follower who develops products and communications that sell or please indicate inadequate conformists resulting from a limited moral vision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research celebrating controversial branding practices surfaces as assuming that brands are fundamentally morally competent (Luo et al, 2013; Mukherjee & Althuizen, 2020). By contrast, the creation of doppelganger brand images (Giesler, 2012; Thompson et al, 2006) captures perceptions of free speech boundary transgression resulting from a lack of moral sensitivity, while condemnations of brands’ communications as green or woke washing (Dahlin et al, 2020; Eilert & Nappier Cherup, 2020) signals opportunism resulting from poor moral integration, and accusations of being a follower who develops products and communications that sell or please indicate inadequate conformists resulting from a limited moral vision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the standard agency framework that relies on setting up an outcome-based contract to align the interest between principal and agent (Eisenhardt, 1989), behavioral agency aims to improve the agency framework by focusing on agent motivation (Pepper & Gore, 2015). Relying upon cognitive evaluation theory, behavioral agency theory argues that agents are not purely motivated by external financial rewards or punishments, that in fact, such extrinsic motivational tools will "crowd out" the agent's intrinsic motivations, and that the agency problem can be most effectively mitigated by relying upon intrinsic factors rather than extrinsic ones (Dahlin et al, 2020;Shi et al, 2017;Sieger et al, 2013). The only problem is that behavioral agency theory does not suggest how such intrinsic motivations can be actuated (Pepper & Gore, 2015).…”
Section: Corporate Social Responsibility and Behavioral Agency Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot has been written about the desirable outcomes of the implementation of CSR at company level ( Bekmeier-Feuerhahn et al., 2017 ; Dahlin et al., 2020 ; Farooq and Salam, 2020 ; Hawn and Ioannou, 2016 ; Liao and Mak, 2019 ; Murillo and Lozano, 2006 ; Real de Oliveira and Ferreira, 2014 ; Shen and Zhang, 2019 ; Tang et al., 2012 ; Yang et al., 2020 ). Various academicians (e.g.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%