Exploring the Contributions of Involving Ordinary Users in Ideation of Technology‐Based Services^*

Abstract

Lead users have long been acknowledged as important contributors to the market success of innovative products and services. The ability of lead users to be such effective innovators has been ascribed to a combination of adequate technological expertise and superior knowledge of the user domain so-called 'use experience'. Drawing on the apparent success of lead users in innovation, many companies are now attempting to involve other types of users, namely ordinary users, for ideation at the 'fuzzy front-end' (FFE) of new product and service development. However, ordinary users do not usually possess the technological knowledge of lead users, and the existing literature provides little guidance on how to manage such user involvement or its expected contributions. The purpose of the present study is, therefore, to contribute to scholarly knowledge regarding the benefits and management of user involvement during the ideation phase of innovation in technology-based services. More specifically, the study investigates the contribution made in this respect by 'ordinary' users, as opposed to professional developers. The research questions that are addressed are: (i) What contributions do ordinary users make when involved in the FFE for ideation of new technology-based services? and (ii) How is the contribution of the users affected by their knowledge of the underlying technology? The study addresses these questions through a literature review and conceptual analysis of the involvement of users in innovation in mobile telephony, followed by an empirical study utilizing a quasiexperimental design in which the independent variable is the users' technological knowledge of the underlying mobile telephone system and the dependent variable is the quality of the created idea-proposals from an innovation perspective. Various scenarios involving 'guided users', 'pioneering users', and 'professionals' are investigated. The study finds that the users' knowledge of the underlying technology has an effect on their propensity to contribute with incremental and/or radical new ideas. The ideas from guided users tend to be more incremental whereas the pioneering users' ideas are more radical. Contrary to the users in the 'guided user' scenarios, the users in the 'pioneering user' scenarios have a propensity to produce ideas that challenge the prevailing dominant logic of the company; these ideas can be utilized to assist the company to think in new trajectories. The article proposes that ordinary users should not be expected to contribute ideas that can be directly put into the new-product development process; rather, ordinary user involvement should be regarded as a process whereby a company learns about users' needs and is inspired to innovate. The article concludes that user involvement can actually be a stimulus for review of a company's business strategy.

Exploring holistic intuitive idea screening in the light of formal criteria

“…Exploring holistic intuitive idea screening in the light of formal criteria. Technovation, DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.03.003 -7 services), Magnusson (2009) used an expert focus group in order to define the selection criteria relevant to mobile telephony services. This resulted in three criteria: Originality, User Value, and Producibility.…”

“…The deregulation and introduction of global standards in the field of telecommunications is one example of advanced communications technology looking for useful applications (Magnusson, 2009). This development has also led to a stream of new product and service ideas within the industry (Montoya-Weiss and O'Driscoll, 2000).…”

User Participation in Software Design via Social Media: Experiences from a Case Study with Consumers

“…Hence, the participating users had a great deal of use knowledge (Magnusson, 2009) related to social media, comprising the user's needs and wants and his/her understanding of how the services create value for the user. Most of the end-users did not have any technical background or previous experience of participating in software development projects.…”

“…Most of the end-users did not have any technical background or previous experience of participating in software development projects. Hence, they did not have much technology knowledge, such as an understanding of the opportunities and limitations of a given technology (Magnusson, 2009), and therefore differed greatly from the developers.…”

Definição do campo das propriedades em aplicações de sistema de engenharia<i> Kansei</i> utilizando<i> inputs</i> de consumidores em lojas virtuais

“…O envolvimento de consumidores com baixo grau de expertise, apesar de considerado importante por vários autores como Magnusson (2009), pode dificultar a elaboração de ideias e conceitos de produtos nas fases iniciais do desenvolvimento de produtos (BONNER;PORTER, 2002;LETTL, 2007).…”