Exploring the creative process in architecture students and professionals

Folch, Teresa Morlà; Pereira, Rosalía Cascón; Icart, Ignasi Brunet

doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100608

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They are also essential for communicating discussion topics and findings to smaller user groups for convergent, focused sessions. To create impactful change and innovation, all participants during this stage should frame the problems holistically so that creativity is maximized (Buchanan, 1992;Dorst, 2011;Folch et al, 2019;Thies, 2015). (Brown, 2008).…”

Section: Mess Findingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Together, they first clarify the “mess” or “wicked problem” needing to be solved, then find the “facts” surrounding the issue, and finally gather existing data to clarify the issue at hand. While defining wicked problems, the team contextualizes the broader concept and initiates the CPS process, all of which encompasses design thinking (Buchanan, 1992; Cooper et al, 2009; Folch et al, 2019). Within this phase, transparent communication between the design team and client is critical and begins with a codesign project team organization chart as seen in Figure 5.…”

Section: Understanding the Problem: Predesign Phasementioning

confidence: 99%

“…A key attribute here is seeking out new contexts by challenging existing frames (Brown, 2008; Cooper et al, 2009) and encouraging all participants to be creatively confident with the freedom to explore (Kelley & Kelley, 2013; Lee, 2020). Although it is important for interdisciplinary team members to provide alternative ideas while exchanging knowledge, the design team needs time to analyze new ideas thoroughly (Folch et al, 2019; Valentine et al, 2017). The transparency and clear communication established in the predesign phase by the organizational team chart and the camaraderie built between the healthcare client and design team during the initial design thinking sessions set the foundation for the now faster-paced, iterative feedback sessions.…”

Section: Generating Ideas: Schematic and Design Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Design Thinking for Healthcare: Transliterating the Creative Problem-Solving Method Into Architectural Practice

Lorusso

Lee

Worden

2021

HERD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to define design thinking, provide insights into how it may be integrated into the healthcare design process, and provide a checklist for future implementation. Background: Design thinking is a collaborative method of inquiry that fosters innovative, team-generated solutions to complex scenarios, known as “wicked problems,” that are extraordinarily difficult to solve. It is a practical tool in the toolbox of the codesign team, which includes the client and design professionals as primary stakeholders. It is powered by team-based creativity that adaptively responds to a need for new approaches and products in an innovative and practically applicable way. The need for design thinking in healthcare is steadily increasing as the healthcare system and its care environments continue to grow in complexity. Although major medical breakthroughs have undeniably expanded the average human life span, the current healthcare system is inefficient. Now, more than ever, design thinking and the innovative, human-centered solutions it enables are needed within healthcare design. Although the use of design thinking as a method within the field of architecture is not new, many design teams struggle integrating it fully within the design process, particularly in healthcare. The knowledge, design method, checklists, and direction provided in this article can benefit healthcare design teams to successfully integrate the method into practice. Conclusion: If design thinking is integrated into the healthcare architectural design process with the creative problem-solving method, opportunities will arise for innovative solutions and deeper insights into problems to benefit healthcare delivery.

show abstract

Section: Mess Findingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Understanding the Problem: Predesign Phasementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Generating Ideas: Schematic and Design Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Design Thinking for Healthcare: Transliterating the Creative Problem-Solving Method Into Architectural Practice

Lorusso

Lee

Worden

2021

HERD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Folch et al (2019) aim at researching the creative process in architecture students and professionals utilizing grounded theory Folch et al (2019). highlight the impact of talking, and dialogical creative process is recommended to bring creativity from An Analysis of Student and Expert Perspectives on Creativity Assessment in Architectural Design Computing Çağın Tanrıverdi Çetin / Ekin Ünlü / Orkan Zeynel Güzelci / Sema Alaçam…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Un análisis de las perspectivas de estudiantes y expertos sobre la evaluación de la creatividad en la informática de diseño arquitectónico

ÇETİN

Ünlü

Güzelci

2023

EST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

El objetivo de este estudio es investigar las posibles diferencias en cómo los estudiantes y los expertos evalúan la creatividad en el contexto del diseño computacional. Con este objetivo, se realizó un experimento de enseñanza en un curso de nivel de maestría, a saber, Diseño y Modelado Arquitectónico Digital (DADM). Se empleó una metodología híbrida basada en técnicas de investigación cualitativas y cuantitativas. Los datos se obtuvieron a partir de una pregunta abierta y un cuestionario online estructurado. Los resultados del cuestionario se evaluaron utilizando el software Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Para evaluar las respuestas de la pregunta abierta, se desarrolló un marco conceptual triple, a saber, contextualización, actualización y representación (CAR), basado en una revisión de la literatura sobre la evaluación de la creatividad en la arquitectura, la educación en arquitectura y el diseño computacional. Los resultados de la comparación entre la forma en que estudiantes y expertos evalúan la creatividad arrojaron diferencias significativas. En algunos criterios que el análisis cuantitativo da como resultado similitudes entre estudiantes y expertos en el contexto de la evaluación de la creatividad, las lentes CAR desarrolladas tienen el potencial de revelar diferencias estructurales en la forma en que los encuestados abordan la creatividad.

show abstract

Exploring the creative process in architecture students and professionals

Cited by 2 publications

References 26 publications

Design Thinking for Healthcare: Transliterating the Creative Problem-Solving Method Into Architectural Practice

Design Thinking for Healthcare: Transliterating the Creative Problem-Solving Method Into Architectural Practice

Un análisis de las perspectivas de estudiantes y expertos sobre la evaluación de la creatividad en la informática de diseño arquitectónico

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About