Exploring the Relationship between Geomagnetic Variations and Seismic Energy Release in Proximity to the Vrancea Seismic Zone

Abstract

Understanding the seismo–ionospheric coupling mechanism requires a quiet geomagnetic condition, as this represents an ideal situation to detect abnormal variations in the geomagnetic field. In reality, continuous interactions between solar wind and Earth’s magnetosphere create many fluctuations in the geomagnetic field that are more related to sun–magnetosphere interactions than to seismotectonic causes. A triaxial magnetometer was installed at the Muntele Rosu Observatory near the Vrancea seismic zone in 1996 to measure the local magnetic field. Since 2002, the data have become more consistent, allowing for the representation of long time series. Since then, variations have been observed on the eastern component (By) of the magnetic field, which sometimes overlaps with significant earthquakes. Previous studies have shown that high decreases in amplitude recorded on the By component of the magnetic field measured at Muntele Rosu have been accompanied by higher seismicity, while small decreases have been accompanied by lower seismic energy release. This research analyzes the geomagnetic data collected between September 2002 and May 2008 from two geomagnetic observatories, one located in the proximity of the Vrancea seismic zone and another one situated 120 km away. For each geomagnetic anomaly identified, the daily seismic energy released was plotted logarithmically, along with seismicity and Kp indices. Additionally, the daily seismic energy released was also plotted logarithmically for all earthquakes with Mw ≥3. To identify variations in the By component, datasets recorded at Muntele Rosu (MLR) were compared with those recorded at Surlari National Geomagnetic Observatory (SUA), to discriminate between global magnetic variations associated with solar activity and possible seismo–electromagnetic variations. The standard deviation (SDBy) was calculated for each anomaly recorded on the By component of the magnetic field and compared with the cumulative seismic energy release. To determine if this type of variation was present in other components of the magnetic field, the following ratios were calculated for all data recorded at Muntele Rosu: Bz/Bx, Bz/By, and Bz/BH. The size of the anomalies resulting from the standard deviation measured on the By component (SDBy) partially validates the relationship between the size of the anomalies and the seismic energy release during the anomaly. The relationship between the released seismic energy and the anomaly magnitude is vaguely respected, but these variations seem to follow two patterns. One pattern is described by smooth decreases, and the other pattern involves decreases where the By component varies significantly over short periods, generating decreases/increases in steps. It was noticed that seismic activity is greater for the second pattern. Additionally, using standard deviation measured on the magnetic field represents a great tool to discriminate external magnetic field variations from local, possibly seismo–magnetic variations.

On the relationship of the Shift of the North Magnetic Pole with Volcanic Activity in the Yellowstone Caldera

“…There are many investigations on the detection of the relationship of volcanic activity and earthquakes with variations in the Earth's magnetic field (Mihai et al, 2023;Petrescu et al, 2022;Takla, 2022). In (Mihai et al, 2023) the authors investigated the relationship between geomagnetic variations and seismic activity for the period from October 2002 to May 2008. The relationship of the magnitude of anomalous changes along the horizontal component of the measured magnetic field with the magnitude of seismic energy during this period partially coincided.…”

“…There are many investigations on the detection of the relationship of volcanic activity and earthquakes with variations in the Earth's magnetic field (Mihai et al, 2023;Petrescu et al, 2022;Takla, 2022). In (Mihai et al, 2023) the authors investigated the relationship between geomagnetic variations and seismic activity for the period from October 2002 to May 2008.…”