2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-011-9324-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the syntactic skills of struggling adult readers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Braze et al (2007) found that a composite oral vocabulary knowledge variable accounted for an additional 6% of the reading comprehension variance beyond decoding and listening comprehension. The Braze et al (2007) finding supports the growing body of research indicating the importance of vocabulary knowledge (Fracasso et al, in press; Hall et al, 2014; Mellard et al, 2010; Taylor, Greenberg, Laures-Gore, & Wise, 2012; Tighe, 2012) to reading comprehension in ABE students. Some of these studies have found that vocabulary knowledge remained a significant predictor after controlling for other component skills: decoding (Hall et al, 2014; Taylor et al, 2012), fluency (Taylor et al, 2012), and morphological awareness (Fracasso et al, in press; Tighe, 2012).…”
Section: The Simple View Of Readingsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, Braze et al (2007) found that a composite oral vocabulary knowledge variable accounted for an additional 6% of the reading comprehension variance beyond decoding and listening comprehension. The Braze et al (2007) finding supports the growing body of research indicating the importance of vocabulary knowledge (Fracasso et al, in press; Hall et al, 2014; Mellard et al, 2010; Taylor, Greenberg, Laures-Gore, & Wise, 2012; Tighe, 2012) to reading comprehension in ABE students. Some of these studies have found that vocabulary knowledge remained a significant predictor after controlling for other component skills: decoding (Hall et al, 2014; Taylor et al, 2012), fluency (Taylor et al, 2012), and morphological awareness (Fracasso et al, in press; Tighe, 2012).…”
Section: The Simple View Of Readingsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Because we decided that each study would only contribute a single predictor-reading comprehension correlation per construct, we excluded predictor variables that were represented only in a single study: syntactic skills (Taylor et al, 2012), prosody (Binder et al, 2013), nonverbal reasoning (Braze et al, 2007), visual memory (Braze et al, 2007), short-term memory (Thompkins & Binder, 2003), and print experience (Braze et al, 2007). This eliminated two studies (Taylor et al, 2012; Binder et al, 2013) because these studies had overlapping samples with other included studies and did not report any further unique predictors. Thus, we included 16 articles and a total of 2,707 participants (ranging from 41 to 486 across studies, M = 169) in our final analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies have identified morphological awareness (Tighe, 2012; Herman, Gilbert-Cote, Reilly, & Binder, 2013; Tighe & Binder, 2014; To, Tighe, & Binder, in press) and vocabulary knowledge (Tighe, 2012; Hall, Greenberg, Laures-Gore, & Pae, 2014; Mellard & Fall, 2012; Mellard, Fall, & Woods, 2010; Taylor, Greenberg, Laures-Gore, & Wise, 2012) as important component skills of reading comprehension in adults with low literacy skills. The extent to which morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge contribute jointly and uniquely to reading comprehension has been investigated extensively with children (Kieffer & Lesaux, 2008; Ku & Anderson, 2003; Nagy, Berninger, & Abbott, 2006; Nagy, Berninger, Abbott, Vaughan, & Vermeulen, 2003; Singson, Mahony, & Mann, 2000); however, it has only been considered in a single study in the low literate adult population (Tighe, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of this paper, we define reading comprehension from the constructivist approach as the process through which the pupils interact with text in a dynamic way in order to construct meaning from it using their background knowledge, the information inferred from the written language and the reading situation itself. August et al (2006: 222) indicate that success in reading is determined by the presence of some interrelated skills, including 'decoding skills (reading words accurately and fluently, accessing lexical representations) and knowledge in several domains (vocabulary, linguistic structure, and discourse as well as world knowledge)' (see also Snow & Matthews, 2016;Kieffer & Lesaux, 2007, 2010Taylor et al, 2011). In addition to these two skills, August et al (2002: 222) consider 'cognitive processing capacities (memory for text, accessing relevant background knowledge, drawing justified inferences)' equally important.…”
Section: Reading Comprehension: Definitions and Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%