2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the threat-sensitive predator avoidance hypothesis on mate competition in two wild populations of Trinidadian guppies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our study, it seems beneficial that the horses' reactions were somewhat limited. Unnecessary responses generate costs for animals (19) and reduce human safety (50). Animals have to choose between acquiring resources (like food) and eliciting antipredator responses (22).…”
Section: Tab 7 Sounds Grouped Into Effect Categories (Different Degre...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to our study, it seems beneficial that the horses' reactions were somewhat limited. Unnecessary responses generate costs for animals (19) and reduce human safety (50). Animals have to choose between acquiring resources (like food) and eliciting antipredator responses (22).…”
Section: Tab 7 Sounds Grouped Into Effect Categories (Different Degre...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adaptive ability of herbivores to assess a threat is based on the trade-off between satisfying basic needs and detecting/avoiding potential dangers (22,23). A reaction inadequate to the degree of threat may result in unnecessary energy expenditure related to the constant readiness to confront the predator or even in death (19). The domestic horse (Equus caballus), as the so-called flight animal, is particularly sensitive to environmental stimuli (50).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, the diversity of fishes tested for response to alarm cues from injured conspecifics has expanded significantly (Chivers & Smith, 1998; Ferrari et al., 2010; Pandey et al., 2021; Wisenden, 2015), but variation in alarm reactions within species, such as between sexes or populations, has received less attention. If the costs of missed mating or foraging opportunities are significantly more pronounced in one sex over the other (e.g., high intrasexual competition) or one sex invests more in reproductive output (i.e., the Asset Protection Principle), we might expect differences in the magnitude or duration of alarm reactions between males and females (Chuard et al., 2020; Clark, 1994; Magurran & Maciás Garcia, 2000). Further, comparative studies of wild populations with variable mortality rates due to predators have provided substantial evidence for local adaptation of antipredator behavior in fish (Evans et al., 2011; Wadgymar et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavioral response of an individual might depend on the sex of its social partner. For example, males in sexual contexts generally court females (suitable sexual partners) but aggressively repel other males (rivals), as observed in birds ( Mays and Hopper 2004 ; Cain et al 2011 ), fishes ( Wong 2004 ; Chuard et al 2020 ), mice ( Palanza et al 1996 ; Stowers et al 2002 ), primates ( Harrison and Tardif 1989 ), and salamanders ( Dantzer and Jaeger 2007 ). Lactating female mice in non-sexual contexts direct more aggression toward male than female conspecific nest intruders, as males are more likely to harm or destroy their litter ( Parmigiani et al 1988 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%