2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring weighted student formulas as a policy for improving equity for distributing resources to schools: A case study of two California school districts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While WSF initiatives presume that some students cost more to educate than others, these programs vary widely in terms of the categories of students deemed more expensive to educate (Furtick & Snell, 2013; Travers, Green, & Miles, 2013). For example, some districts, such as Cincinnati, Denver, Houston, New York City, and San Francisco, provide weights for students who live in poverty; other locales, such as Baltimore, only weight poverty for high school students; still others, such as Hartford, do not provide poverty weights at all (Chambers, Levin, & Shambaugh, 2010; Chambers, Shambaugh, Levin, & Muraki, 2008; Education Resource Strategies, 2010; Miles & Roza, 2006; Miles, Ware, & Roza, 2003). Some districts, such as Baltimore and Hartford, include weights for students who demonstrate high achievement 3 as well as low achievement, whereas other districts, such as Cincinnati, Denver, and New York City, only include weights for struggling students (Education Resource Strategies, 2010).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While WSF initiatives presume that some students cost more to educate than others, these programs vary widely in terms of the categories of students deemed more expensive to educate (Furtick & Snell, 2013; Travers, Green, & Miles, 2013). For example, some districts, such as Cincinnati, Denver, Houston, New York City, and San Francisco, provide weights for students who live in poverty; other locales, such as Baltimore, only weight poverty for high school students; still others, such as Hartford, do not provide poverty weights at all (Chambers, Levin, & Shambaugh, 2010; Chambers, Shambaugh, Levin, & Muraki, 2008; Education Resource Strategies, 2010; Miles & Roza, 2006; Miles, Ware, & Roza, 2003). Some districts, such as Baltimore and Hartford, include weights for students who demonstrate high achievement 3 as well as low achievement, whereas other districts, such as Cincinnati, Denver, and New York City, only include weights for struggling students (Education Resource Strategies, 2010).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baker, Sciarra and Farrie (2009 use a regression based approach to determine the extent that state and local revenues per pupil vary, across districts, across states, with respect to child poverty concentrations, controlling for competitive wage variation, economies of scale and population density. Others have applied similar approaches to evaluate the sensitivity of school site budgets to student characteristics (Ajwad, 2006;Baker 2009Baker , 2012Chambers, Levin, & Shambaugh 2010;Levin et al, 2013). The goal of these regression-based methods is to determine the relationship between variation in poverty concentrations across schools or districts and availability of financial resources, controlling for exogenous cost pressures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondents in both districts reported making staffing changes as a result of the reforms (Chambers et al, 2008). However, the number of full-time staff per student remained unchanged in both districts after the implementation of the weighted student formulas (Chambers et al, 2008), and the distribution of novice teachers across schools in the district remained unchanged (Chambers, Levin, & Shambaugh, 2010). Further, respondents reported that few programmatic changes were made as a result of the new weighted student formulas (Chambers et al, 2008).…”
Section: Fiscal Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies on fiscal flexibility reforms point to the difficulty in analyzing resource allocation, given the nature of fiscal flexibility (Chambers et al, 2010;Shambaugh et al, 2008;Weston, 2011). In sum, there is limited evidence on the effects of fiscal flexibility (Fuller et al, 2011;Petko, 2005).…”
Section: Fiscal Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%