2009
DOI: 10.1080/08929880903368690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explosive Properties of Reactor-Grade Plutonium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Reactor-grade Pu typically contains more than 35 % 239 Pu with a 240 Pu/ 239 Pu atom ratio of 0.2 -1.0 after fuel burn-up (Yamana et al, 2001). The 240 Pu/ 239 Pu atom ratio in weapon-grade Pu is much lower (0.02 -0.06) because burn-up is kept low to minimise the production of higher Pu isotopes (Mark, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reactor-grade Pu typically contains more than 35 % 239 Pu with a 240 Pu/ 239 Pu atom ratio of 0.2 -1.0 after fuel burn-up (Yamana et al, 2001). The 240 Pu/ 239 Pu atom ratio in weapon-grade Pu is much lower (0.02 -0.06) because burn-up is kept low to minimise the production of higher Pu isotopes (Mark, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ATTR level of weapon grade referred to plutonium compositions of weapon grade based on the weapon grade composition of Pellaud, Mark, and Devolpi. 12,24,26) The less attractiveness level of the axial blanket region than that of the radial blanket region is caused by the higher obtained even mass of plutonium compositions for the axial blanket region in the no MA doping case. Those attractiveness levels of blanket regions decrease with reactor operation time.…”
Section: Materials Attractiveness Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those indexes are adjustable to reflect the peculiarities of energy release in a particular configuration; for instance, when n is set to unity, it might be used to characterize the energy release in a system without any material density effect or variations, and in addition, when n is set to 3, as shown in Ref. 26), to reflect the energy release in a system with material density effect. MCNP-4C 27) and Nuclear Data Library JENDL-3.3 28) are adopted for evaluating this material attractiveness, which is related to the Rossialpha evaluation.…”
Section: Attractiveness Of Materials Based On Plutonium Isotope Composmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations