2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00208-013-0940-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exponential decay estimates for singular integral operators

Abstract: Abstract. The following subexponential estimate for commutators is provedwhere c and α are absolute constants, T is a Calderón-Zygmund operator, M is the Hardy Littlewood maximal function and f is any function supported on the cube Q ⊂ R n . We also obtain thatwhere m f (Q) is the median value of f on the cube Q and M # λn;Q is Strömberg's local sharp maximal function with λn = 2 −n−2 . As a consequence we derive Karagulyan's estimate:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also remark that in [20] a similar local subexponential decay is proved for the commutator [b, T ] above. It is natural to ask if it is possible to prove a Coifman-Fefferman inequality for [b, T ] via truncation, exponential decay and sharp RHI.…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also remark that in [20] a similar local subexponential decay is proved for the commutator [b, T ] above. It is natural to ask if it is possible to prove a Coifman-Fefferman inequality for [b, T ] via truncation, exponential decay and sharp RHI.…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 67%
“…As a final remark on Coifman-Fefferman type inequalities, we want to mention that for the case of C-Z operators, Theorem 2.1 can be deduced from a combination of standard good-λ techniques together with the following local exponential estimate from [20], which is an improvement of the classical result of Buckley [4] (see also [11]). This theorem is essentially all we need for the proof of Theorem 2.1 since, by standard truncation arguments, we can restrict ourselves to look at only the local part.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denote b m = Q∈Sm χ Q , then A Sm f ≤ 2 m+1 b m . and therefore, if we denote S * m is the collection of maximal dyadic cubes in S m , taking into account the local exponential decay for sparse operators (see for instance [29]),…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use now one of the key estimates from [24]. Indeed, let {E(P )} P ∈S, P ⊆Q j be the family of sets from Definition 3.…”
Section: Definition 2 (Dyadic Lattice) a Dyadic Lattice D In R N Is mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by this result of Karagulyan, Ortiz-Caraballo, Rela and the first author developed a new method for proving (6) in [24]. This method is flexible enough to deal with other operators including the commutators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%