2010
DOI: 10.1002/mde.1500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Export orientation and technical efficiency: clothing firms in China

Abstract: Based on 287 of the largest clothing manufacturing firms in southern China in terms of output value, we employed data envelopment analysis to estimate the technical efficiency of the sample firms. A regression analysis was conducted to examine the effects of export orientation on technical efficiency. Our results suggest a U-shaped relationship between export ratio and technical efficiency. The specific nature of the industry in Guangdong province can explain that clothing firms with a high degree of sales in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such global interconnectedness, the role of exports, imports, and foreign direct investment on firm's efficiency has attracted much attention of scholars ( Lemi and Wright, 2020 ; Padilla et al., 2019 ). Market liberalization is generally believed to facilitate improvement in technical efficiency through export and import activity ( Ben Yahmed and Dougherty, 2017 ; Mok et al., 2010 ; Saputra, 2014 ) and through technology adoption via high-quality resources ( Mazorodze, 2020 ; Piermartini and Rubínová, 2014 ; Suatmi et al., 2017 ). On the other hand, FDI is expected to be advantageous for host countries as it provides new capital, generates employment, supports building production capacity, and brings superior technology ( Arnold and Javorcik, 2009 ; Sari et al., 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such global interconnectedness, the role of exports, imports, and foreign direct investment on firm's efficiency has attracted much attention of scholars ( Lemi and Wright, 2020 ; Padilla et al., 2019 ). Market liberalization is generally believed to facilitate improvement in technical efficiency through export and import activity ( Ben Yahmed and Dougherty, 2017 ; Mok et al., 2010 ; Saputra, 2014 ) and through technology adoption via high-quality resources ( Mazorodze, 2020 ; Piermartini and Rubínová, 2014 ; Suatmi et al., 2017 ). On the other hand, FDI is expected to be advantageous for host countries as it provides new capital, generates employment, supports building production capacity, and brings superior technology ( Arnold and Javorcik, 2009 ; Sari et al., 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking destination into account has therefore brought to light more understanding of the t nexus between exports and efficiency. In the case of the Chinese clothing industry, a significant U-shaped nexus exists between efficiency level and export orientation, as observed by [ 46 ]. With a large extent of export orientation and experience and high sales in the domestic markets industry, specific effects can explain clothing firms in the Chinese Guangdong province.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the minimum number of decision-making units required for discrimination between efficient and inefficient performers, there is no fixed rule of thumb, three times the number of inputs is acceptable (Sarkis, 2007). DEA has been used extensively to study efficiency in apparel sector (Gambhir & Sharma, 2017; Joshi & Singh, 2012; Mok et al, 2010; Vixathep & Matsunaga, 2012a, 2012b). Given that technical efficiency is to be measured using traditional input–output variables, the widely used and time-tested Banker, Charnes, and Cooper model is applied under input orientation.…”
Section: Empirical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not necessary to deflate the financial figures in a cross-sectional efficiency analysis. Firm-level characteristics said to have influence on efficiency performance are firm age, export orientation, capital intensity, and scale of operation (Chapelle & Plane, 2005; Hashim, 2005; Hill & Kalirajan, 1993; Joshi & Singh, 2012; Mok et al, 2010; Vixathep & Matsunaga, 2012a; Vixathep & Matsunaga, 2012b; Wadud, 2004). Based on the data set, relevant variables for age, export intensity, capital intensity, and labor-staff ratio were considered under tobit analysis (Table 3).…”
Section: Empirical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%